Autonomous Storage Robot Rerouting for Scalable Inventory Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current autonomous inventory management systems lack scalability and adaptability, with centralized logic architecture leading to increased latency and limited capabilities in responding to inventory demands and disruptions, as well as a lack of intelligence in inventory handling and transportation robots that are unaware of their cargo and environmental conditions.

Innovation Solution

An autonomous inventory management system that includes an autonomous storage robot capable of real-time tracking, decision-making, and rerouting, equipped with RFID, weighing scales, climate control, and navigation technologies, allowing it to adapt to changes and provide timely status updates, and featuring built-in sensors and communication systems for efficient inventory management.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a centralized logic architecture is used to control robot fleets, then coordination and control are simplified, but scalability is reduced and latency increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol architecture complexityVSAvoidsystem scalability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the centralized control architecture into distributed autonomous units. Each robot is segmented as an independent intelligent agent with its own decision-making capabilities, rather than being controlled centrally. This segmentation enables scalability as new robots can join the network without requiring central reconfiguration, while maintaining coordination through peer-to-peer communication protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from a vertical hierarchical control structure (centralized top-down control) to a horizontal distributed network structure. This dimensional change allows the system to scale across multiple nodes at the same level, reducing latency by eliminating centralized bottlenecks while maintaining system-wide coordination through networked communication.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Extent of automation

If current automation systems are deployed for inventory management, then basic transportation tasks are automated, but adaptability to inventory demands and disruptions is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransportation automationVSAvoidresponse to inventory demands
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service through autonomous robots that independently monitor their own inventory status, detect disruptions, and make real-time decisions about route adjustments and task prioritization. Each robot serves itself by maintaining awareness of its cargo conditions (temperature, vibrations) and autonomously responding to changes without requiring constant external intervention, thereby enhancing adaptability while maintaining high automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates continuous feedback loops where robots monitor environmental conditions (temperature, vibrations, location) and inventory status, then use this feedback to dynamically adjust their behavior. This real-time feedback enables the system to adapt to inventory demands and disruptions while maintaining automated operation, resolving the contradiction between automation extent and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Extent of automation

If robots are equipped with basic transportation functionality, then automation capability is achieved, but intelligence and awareness of inventory conditions are lacking

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverobot transportation capabilityVSAvoidinventory awareness
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes robots universal by equipping them with multiple functional capabilities beyond basic transportation. Each robot integrates sensing (RFID, environmental sensors), decision-making (autonomous routing, task prioritization), and execution (transportation, inventory monitoring) functions. This multi-functionality enables robots to maintain automation capability while simultaneously gaining comprehensive awareness of inventory conditions through integrated sensing and processing systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Ease of manufacture

If shelves are designed for basic storage only, then manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but functionality and adaptability are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshelf manufacturing simplicityVSAvoidstorage functionality
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces autonomous robots as intermediaries between simple storage shelves and complex inventory management requirements. Rather than making shelves themselves complex and adaptive, the system uses intelligent robots to provide the adaptability layer. The shelves remain structurally simple for easy manufacture, while the robots equipped with sensing and decision-making capabilities provide the necessary functionality and adaptability for modern inventory management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS11790315B2Systems, methods, computing platforms, and storage media for directing and controlling an autonomous inventory management system
Publication Date: 2023.10.17 PRIME ROBOTICS INC
  • US11790315B2 patent drawing
  • US11790315B2 patent drawing
  • US11790315B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, methods, computing platforms, and storage media for directing and controlling an autonomous inventory management system are disclosed. Exemplary implementations may place an inventory item in an autonomous storage unit, direct the autonomous storage unit to depart a starting location, direct the autonomous storage unit to board a first transport system departing for a first arrival location, determine whether an event will delay or expedite the arrival of the autonomous storage unit at the first arrival location, determine alternative routing options for the autonomous storage unit to continue travel to the first arrival location, recalculate the route of the autonomous storage unit to the first arrival location, and select a new route to the first arrival location.