Storage System Snapshot Validation via I/O Replay

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional data protection systems face challenges in efficiently generating and validating snapshot replicas, leading to increased journal lag and recovery time objectives, as well as resource consumption, which can result in reduced performance and potential data corruption.

Innovation Solution

The method involves periodically generating writeable snapshot replicas of a production site during a snapshot interval, saving I/O requests, and replaying them in a test environment to enable debugging and data recovery, while also employing obfuscated production data to maintain sensitive information security.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If snapshot replicas are generated periodically during snapshot interval, then data protection is improved, but journal lag and recovery time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata protectionVSAvoidrecovery time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary validation of snapshot replicas by replaying I/O requests in a test environment before the snapshot interval expires. This advance validation ensures that the next snapshot replica will be valid, allowing the system to skip validation steps during actual recovery operations, thereby reducing recovery time while maintaining data protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The snapshot validation process is made self-service by automatically replaying I/O requests through test applications in a controlled environment. The system autonomously verifies snapshot integrity without requiring manual intervention or full system recovery, thus validating snapshots quickly and reducing the time penalty associated with periodic snapshot generation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If snapshot validation is performed by replaying I/O requests, then data integrity is improved, but resource consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata integrityVSAvoidresource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The validation process applies local quality by creating a localized test environment that mirrors only the necessary components for validation. Instead of validating the entire production system, the system uses a simplified test environment with test applications that receive replayed I/O requests, consuming minimal resources while still ensuring data integrity of the snapshot replica.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a copy of the snapshot replica in a test environment for validation purposes. This copy is used to replay I/O requests and verify integrity, while the original snapshot remains intact and ready for quick recovery. The copying approach allows thorough validation without risking the production system or requiring excessive resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Measurement precision

If production data is used in test environment, then debugging accuracy is improved, but data security is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedebugging accuracyVSAvoiddata security
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the necessary I/O requests from the production environment and replays them in the test environment with obfuscated data. This extraction approach maintains debugging accuracy by preserving the operational patterns and sequences, while removing sensitive production data to maintain security. The test applications process these extracted requests without accessing actual production data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the data parameters in the test environment by obfuscating production data while maintaining the structural and operational characteristics needed for accurate debugging. This parameter transformation allows test applications to validate snapshot integrity and debug issues with the same level of precision as production data would provide, while security requirements are satisfied through data obfuscation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10210073B1Real time debugging of production replicated data with data obfuscation in a storage system
Publication Date: 2019.02.19 EMC IP HLDG CO LLC
  • US10210073B1 patent drawing
  • US10210073B1 patent drawing
  • US10210073B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Described embodiments provide systems and methods for operating a storage system. Writeable snapshot replicas of a production site of the storage system are periodically generated during a snapshot interval. The production site includes a production volume, a production memory, and at least one production application. Input/output (I/O) requests of the at least one production application are saved during the snapshot interval. A test environment is initiated with the writeable snapshot, the test environment comprising a test volume, a test memory, and at least one test application. The at least one test application is run in the test environment and the saved I/O requests of the at least one production application are replayed to the at least one test application in the test environment. Output data is provided from the test environment to the writeable snapshot.