Storage Tier Metafile Verification for Low-Latency Volume Mounts

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Storage systems face challenges in ensuring data validity and consistency, particularly with remote object stores that may return old data or fail to provide adequate guarantees due to delays, leading to inconsistencies in metafiles used for managing storage.

Innovation Solution

Implement storage tier verification checks during the mount operation, including quick verification of metafiles like volume and staging area information metafiles, with distributed checks deferred to the background to minimize client latency and ensure data consistency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If storage tier verification checks are performed during mount operation, then data consistency is improved, but mount operation time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata consistencyVSAvoidmount operation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The verification process is divided into two segments: quick verification of critical metafiles (volume information metafile, staging area information metafile) performed during mount operation, and distributed verification of other metafiles performed in the background. This segmentation allows critical consistency checks to be completed quickly while non-critical checks proceed asynchronously, resolving the contradiction between ensuring data consistency and minimizing mount operation time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary verification of the most critical metafiles (volume information and staging area information metafiles) before allowing client access. This preliminary action ensures that essential data consistency checks are completed during the mount operation, while less critical verifications are deferred to the background, thus balancing reliability improvement with time loss minimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If distributed verification of all metafiles is performed, then data consistency is improved, but client access latency increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata consistencyVSAvoidclient access latency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The verification process is segmented into immediate verification of critical metafiles during mount operation and deferred distributed verification of other metafiles in the background. This allows client access to be granted after essential checks, while comprehensive verification continues asynchronously, thus improving data consistency without significantly increasing client access latency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial verification during the mount operation by focusing only on the most critical metafiles (volume information and staging area information metafiles) rather than verifying all metafiles. This partial action ensures essential data consistency while minimizing the impact on client access latency, with the understanding that more comprehensive verification occurs in the background.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Quantity of substance

If remote object store is used for capacity tier, then storage capacity is improved, but data guarantee capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestorage capacityVSAvoiddata guarantee capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary verification mechanism that acts as a mediator between the storage system and the remote object store. The verification component checks the consistency of metafiles that manage data in the remote object store, providing an intermediate layer of assurance that compensates for the remote store's lack of inherent data guarantees, thus maintaining reliability while utilizing remote capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the verification component continuously monitors and verifies the consistency of metafiles associated with the remote object store. This feedback loop detects and addresses inconsistencies in the remote storage data, providing ongoing assurance of data integrity despite the remote object store's limited guarantee capabilities, thereby enabling safe use of remote capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250225122A1Storage tier verification checks
Publication Date: 2025.07.10 NETAPP INC
  • US20250225122A1 patent drawing
  • US20250225122A1 patent drawing
  • US20250225122A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques are provided for storage tier verification checks. A determination is made that a mount operation of an aggregate of a set of volumes stored within a multi-tier storage environment has completed. A first metafile and a second metafile are maintained to track information related to the storage of objects of a volume of the aggregate within a remote object store that is a tier of the multi-tier storage environment. A distributed verification is performed between the first metafile and the second metafile to identify an inconsistency. Accordingly, the first metafile and the second metafile are reconciled to address the inconsistency so that storage information within the first metafile and the second metafile are consistent.