Autonomous Storage Unit Boarding Order for Low-Latency Inventory Transport

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current autonomous inventory management systems face challenges in scalability, latency, and limited intelligence, particularly in adapting to inventory demands and environmental conditions, leading to inefficiencies in transportation and storage operations.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for controlling autonomous inventory management, utilizing hardware processors configured by machine-readable instructions to direct transport systems to transport autonomous storage units between locations, determining drop-off locations, and optimizing boarding orders, incorporating navigation, sensing, and control devices to enhance operational efficiency and adaptability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If centralized processing systems are used to control robot fleets and transportation systems, then coordination and control are simplified, but scalability is limited and latency increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoordination and controlVSAvoidscalability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the centralized processing architecture into distributed edge computing nodes deployed across multiple geographic sites. Each edge node processes local inventory management tasks autonomously, while still coordinating with other nodes through standardized communication protocols. This segmentation enables the system to scale across multiple locations without overloading a single central processor, reducing latency while maintaining coordination capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Ease of manufacture

If current robots and transportation systems are used, then existing infrastructure is maintained, but adaptability to inventory demands and environmental conditions is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinfrastructure maintenanceVSAvoidadaptability to inventory demands
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic task allocation and routing systems that allow robots and transportation units to adapt their behavior in real-time based on changing inventory demands, environmental conditions, and system state. The edge computing nodes continuously analyze local conditions and dynamically adjust task assignments, route planning, and resource allocation, enabling the system to respond flexibly to varying requirements while operating within existing infrastructure constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Area of stationary object

If autonomous storage units are deployed across multiple geographic sites, then inventory management coverage is expanded, but system complexity and communication requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinventory management coverageVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs universal standardized communication protocols and interfaces that enable autonomous storage units and edge computing nodes to operate consistently across multiple geographic sites. The modular edge node architecture provides multi-functional capabilities including local task management, data processing, and inter-site coordination through standardized protocols, reducing system complexity despite expanded geographic coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Loss of time

If real-time autonomous decision-making is implemented, then response time to inventory demands is reduced, but processing requirements and computational load increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse timeVSAvoidcomputational load
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces edge computing nodes as intermediary processing layers between the autonomous storage units and central cloud systems. These edge nodes perform real-time data processing and autonomous decision-making locally at each geographic site, reducing the computational load on individual storage units and eliminating the need for constant cloud communication. This intermediary architecture enables fast local responses while distributing the overall computational burden across multiple edge nodes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS12065310B2Systems, methods, computing platforms, and storage media for controlling an autonomous inventory management system
Publication Date: 2024.08.20 PRIME ROBOTICS INC
  • US12065310B2 patent drawing
  • US12065310B2 patent drawing
  • US12065310B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, methods, computing platforms, and storage media for controlling an autonomous inventory management system are disclosed. Exemplary implementations may: direct a first transport system to a first location; determine a respective drop off location for each of the one or more autonomous storage units; determine a boarding order for the one or more autonomous storage units based at least in part on the respective drop off location for each of the one or more autonomous storage units; direct the one or more autonomous storage units to board the first transport system at the first location; and transport the one or more autonomous storage units from the first location to the one or more respective drop off locations.