Storage System Background Workflow Scheduling Using Historical Load Data

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Storage systems experience performance drops due to background operations competing with initiator I/O operations for resources during high load periods, leading to decreased throughput and increased latency.

Innovation Solution

A system that schedules background workflows using historical load statistics to estimate preferred times for scheduling, allocating resources optimally by calculating weighted averages and providing quotas for background operations to minimize impact on primary I/O operations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If background operations are scheduled during high I/O activity periods, then system resource utilization increases, but storage system performance decreases due to decreased throughput and increased latency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem resource utilizationVSAvoidstorage system performance
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of historical load data to predict future I/O patterns before scheduling background operations. By analyzing past load statistics and calculating weighted averages, the system proactively identifies optimal scheduling windows that avoid high-I/O periods, thereby preventing performance degradation before it occurs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The background operation scheduler dynamically adjusts its behavior based on predicted load patterns. Instead of using fixed scheduling intervals, the system adapts its scheduling decisions based on analyzed historical data, weighting recent patterns more heavily to respond to changing workload characteristics while avoiding periods of high I/O activity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If background operations are scheduled during low system load periods, then initiator I/O performance is maintained, but overall system productivity decreases due to underutilization of resources

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinitiator I/O performanceVSAvoidsystem resource utilization
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary prediction of future load patterns using historical data analysis before making scheduling decisions. By calculating weighted averages of past load statistics, the system identifies optimal time windows that balance maintaining low latency for initiator I/O while still providing adequate resources for background operations during predicted low-I/O periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the scheduling parameters of background operations based on predicted load conditions. By adjusting scheduling timing and resource allocation parameters according to predicted I/O patterns, the system optimizes the balance between maintaining initiator performance and utilizing system resources efficiently during low-demand periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If historical load data is collected and analyzed to predict future load patterns, then background operation scheduling improves, but system complexity increases due to data collection and processing requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebackground operation schedulingVSAvoiddata collection and processing system
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service by automatically collecting, storing, and analyzing its own historical load data without external intervention. The scheduler autonomously processes past performance metrics, calculates weighted averages, and generates scheduling predictions, eliminating the need for manual configuration or external analysis tools while managing the complexity internally.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from historical load data to continuously improve its scheduling predictions. By analyzing past performance and adjusting its models based on actual load patterns, the system refines its prediction accuracy over time, making the added complexity worthwhile through progressively better scheduling decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS8024542B1Allocating background workflows in a data storage system using historical data
Publication Date: 2011.09.20 AMZETTA TECH LLC
  • US8024542B1 patent drawing
  • US8024542B1 patent drawing
  • US8024542B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Technologies are described for implementing a system that schedules background workflows in a storage system. The background workflows may be automated maintenance tasks that require data movement, or any other tasks that would otherwise compete with normal input/output operations. Historical load statistics can be analyzed to estimate the preferred times in the future during which to schedule background workflows. After collecting data access statistics and usage patterns for several days or weeks, a number of averages can be calculated from the statistics at various natural periods of system utilization. For example, daily, weekly, or other periods. A weighted average can be established where weighting can place more emphasis on recent data. Such averages can serve as predictors of future loads having similar periodic relationships to the historical load data. Predicting future loads can improve the scheduling of background operations by avoiding conflicts with normal system operations.