Store Purchase Auditing with Risk-Based Exit Verification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Customers often exit stores with unpaid items, leading to lost inventory and revenue, and manual checks at exits cause delays and inefficiencies.

Innovation Solution

A system using a control circuit and user interface to assign a score to sales transactions based on item composition and worker attributes, determining the quantity of items to verify before exit, and providing instructions to workers through electronic devices.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual checks are performed at store exit to verify purchased items, then the likelihood of unpaid items leaving the store is reduced, but customer wait time increases and exit efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection of unpaid itemsVSAvoidcustomer wait time at exit
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary verification by capturing images of items at the point of purchase and comparing them against the receipt before the customer reaches the exit. This advance checking eliminates the need for time-consuming manual verification at the exit point, thereby reducing customer wait time while maintaining detection effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical verification process with an automated image recognition and comparison system. Cameras capture item images, which are then processed by a control circuit to match against receipt data, substituting human labor with automated optical and computational systems to improve efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If all purchased items are manually verified at exit, then detection accuracy of unpaid items is maximized, but productivity at exit decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of item verificationVSAvoidexit processing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system captures images of all items but strategically selects only suspicious or high-value items for detailed verification based on risk assessment algorithms. This partial verification approach maintains high detection accuracy for problematic items while avoiding unnecessary verification of clearly paid items, thus preserving exit productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

Automated image recognition and pattern matching systems replace manual item-by-item verification, enabling rapid processing of multiple items simultaneously. The control circuit efficiently compares captured images with receipt data, achieving both high accuracy and fast processing speeds that manual verification cannot match.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If store associates manually check receipts and items at exit, then unpaid items are detected, but labor requirements and operational complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection of unpaid itemsVSAvoidmanual verification process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-verification where the automated image recognition and comparison processes perform the detection function without requiring store associate intervention. The system independently captures images, processes them through recognition algorithms, and identifies potential unpaid items, making the verification process autonomous and reducing operational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the complex manual verification workflow with an integrated automated system combining cameras, image processing units, and database comparison capabilities. This substitution simplifies the overall process by consolidating multiple manual steps into a single automated flow, reducing both labor requirements and operational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS20250245657A1Systems and methods to audit purchases at a store
Publication Date: 2025.07.31 WALMART APOLLO LLC
  • US20250245657A1 patent drawing
  • US20250245657A1 patent drawing
  • US20250245657A1 patent drawing

AI summary

In some embodiments, apparatuses and methods are provided herein useful to auditing purchases at a store. In some embodiments, there is provided a system for auditing purchases at a store including: a control circuit and a user interface operable on an electronic device. The control circuit configured to: receive purchase data; assign a score to a sales transaction; assign, based on at least the score, a quantity of items to be verified by a worker prior to the customer leaving the store; and output transaction data comprising at least a transaction identifier associated with the sales transaction and the quantity of the items to be verified by the worker. The user interface configured to: receive the transaction data from the control circuit; and display instructions to the worker indicating the quantity of items of the sales transaction to be verified.