Store System User Rank Incentive Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Store systems face challenges in promoting sales as users may choose not to purchase items when they find lower prices at other stores, potentially missing sales opportunities due to price comparison.

Innovation Solution

An information processing apparatus that ranks users based on their purchase amounts and updates their rank and cumulative purchase amount if they choose not to purchase an item priced higher at their store compared to others, adding an additional amount to incentivize purchases of higher-priced items.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the store sells commodities at market prices, then the store can maintain normal pricing, but users may choose not to purchase when prices are higher than other stores, resulting in lost sales opportunities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesales volumeVSAvoidprice comparison effect
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent converts the harmful effect of price comparison into a beneficial incentive mechanism. When users find higher prices at the own store compared to other stores, the system automatically provides compensation (additional amount) to offset the price difference, transforming the potential loss from price comparison into an opportunity to enhance user satisfaction and promote sales.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the pricing parameter dynamically based on external price information. By acquiring price information from other stores and calculating the difference, the system adjusts the effective price for users through compensation, making the final price competitive while maintaining the store's original pricing strategy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If the store provides price matching or compensation for higher prices, then user motivation to purchase increases, but the store incurs additional costs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesales conversion rateVSAvoidadditional compensation cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial compensation rather than full price matching. The compensation amount is calculated as a portion of the price difference (additional amount), not necessarily the complete difference. This partial action approach provides sufficient incentive for users to purchase while limiting the store's additional cost exposure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback mechanism where price information from other stores is continuously acquired and used to adjust compensation amounts. This feedback loop allows the store to respond dynamically to market conditions, providing compensation only when necessary and at appropriate levels, thereby optimizing the balance between sales motivation and cost control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11580566B2Store system, information processing apparatus, and information processing method therefor
Publication Date: 2023.02.14 TOSHIBA TEC KK
  • US11580566B2 patent drawing
  • US11580566B2 patent drawing
  • US11580566B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In accordance with an embodiment, an information processing apparatus acquires a rank of a visiting user and an amount according to the ranking. The information processing apparatus acquires a price at an own store of a commodity that the user has selected for purchase. The information processing apparatus acquires a price at another store of the commodity that the user has selected for purchase. In a case in which the price at the own store is higher than the price at the other store, the information processing apparatus adds an amount based on a difference in price therebetween to the amount according to the ranking, which is acquired by a first acquisition means.