Stowable Vehicle Ramp Nesting and Dynamics

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle ramps do not offer an efficient and economical solution for easy loading access, as they lack automatic or manual extension and stowage options within or under the vehicle bed, such as trucks or pickup trucks.

Innovation Solution

A stowable ramp system that can be retrofitted onto existing vehicles, featuring a ramp assembly that can be inlayed or mounted underneath the bed, with manual or automatic extension and retraction capabilities, using a control assembly with a motor and tracking members for remote operation, and made from durable materials like aluminum, metal, or plastic.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a ramp is provided for vehicle loading, then loading access is improved, but the device occupies space in the vehicle bed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveloading accessVSAvoidvehicle bed space
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The ramp is designed to nest within the vehicle bed structure when not in use. The ramp can be stored in a recessed compartment or folded against the bed walls, allowing it to occupy minimal space during normal vehicle operation while being readily accessible when needed for loading.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The ramp transitions from a static space-consuming object to a dynamic structure that can be deployed and retracted as needed. This allows the vehicle bed to maintain full cargo capacity when the ramp is stowed, while providing easy loading access when the ramp is extended to the ground.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Device complexity

If manual extension and retraction is used, then device complexity is reduced, but ease of operation decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol mechanismVSAvoidramp deployment
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The ramp is divided into multiple telescoping sections that can extend and retract independently. This segmentation allows the ramp to be manually deployed in stages, reducing the force required compared to moving a single large mass, while maintaining structural integrity throughout the extension process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Rollers or wheels are introduced as intermediary elements between the ramp and the ground/bed. These rollers reduce friction during extension and retraction, making manual operation significantly easier while adding minimal complexity to the overall system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If the ramp is made sturdy to support heavy loads, then reliability is improved, but weight of the object increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload bearing capacityVSAvoidramp weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The ramp incorporates composite material construction, combining materials with high strength-to-weight ratios. This allows the ramp to maintain the structural integrity needed for heavy load support while minimizing its own weight, making it easier to deploy and retract manually.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The ramp uses a telescoping design where multiple sections extend and retract. When fully extended, the distributed structure provides adequate support for heavy loads. When retracted, the overall weight and space occupation are minimized, creating a dynamic solution that adapts to different operational states.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Ease of operation

If automatic extension and retraction is implemented, then ease of operation is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveramp deploymentVSAvoidcontrol system
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The ramp incorporates self-contained mechanical systems such as springs, gravity-assisted rollback mechanisms, or motorized reels that automatically extend or retract the ramp based on simple user input. This provides near-automatic operation while avoiding the need for complex control systems, sensors, or power sources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Complex electronic control systems are replaced with simpler mechanical automation mechanisms. For example, a spring-loaded system or gravity-based rollback mechanism provides automatic retraction without requiring motors, circuits, or electronic controls, thereby improving ease of operation while limiting the increase in device complexity and cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS11034275B1System for a stowable vehicle ramp
Publication Date: 2021.06.15 SMITH CLARENCE
  • US11034275B1 patent drawing
  • US11034275B1 patent drawing
  • US11034275B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for a stowable vehicle ramp including a vehicle assembly, a ramp assembly and a control assembly is disclosed. The ramp assembly includes a ramp that is automatically or manually extended out, and either stowed under or inlayed in the bed of a vehicle of the vehicle assembly such as a truck or pickup truck. It is possible to retrofit the ramp onto existing vehicles such as pickups or trucks. The stowable ramp aids in providing easy loading access to the bed of the vehicle for smaller vehicles needing transportation.