Straight Through Processing Interface for Policy Illustration Comparison

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional insurance policy processing is time- and resource-intensive, involving multiple steps, third-party vendors, and informal back-and-forth negotiations, leading to bottlenecks and increased processing time and frustration for financial advisors and clients.

Innovation Solution

An electronic environment for straight-through processing (STP) is provided, featuring an advisor-located workstation with an interface screen that displays side-by-side policy illustrations, automated controls, and integrated workflow to streamline the insurance sales process, reduce data entry, and enforce operational governance rules, eliminating third-party delays and bottlenecks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional third-party vendor processing is used, then policy illustrations can be generated, but processing time increases to days or weeks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepolicy illustration accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the illustration generation function from external third-party vendors and integrates it directly into the advisor's workstation software. This eliminates the external processing bottleneck while maintaining illustration accuracy, reducing turnaround time from days/weeks to real-time or near-real-time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary illustration generation engine that sits between the advisor's input and the final illustration output. This engine processes illustrations locally or via direct electronic connection, eliminating the need for physical mail or external vendor processing while ensuring accuracy through systematic generation rules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If informal back-and-forth negotiation process is used, then policy options can be discussed, but processing time and effort increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepolicy negotiation flexibilityVSAvoidprocess simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic, real-time illustration generation that allows advisors to instantly adjust policy parameters and see updated illustrations during client meetings. This maintains negotiation flexibility while eliminating the need for formal, time-consuming back-and-forth correspondence, as changes can be made and visualized immediately.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables advisors to self-generate and self-adjust policy illustrations without external vendor intervention. The embedded engine allows real-time modification of policy terms and immediate regeneration of illustrations, simplifying the negotiation process while maintaining adaptability to client preferences.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If manual underwriting and policy issuance process is used, then contracts can be finalized, but errors increase processing time and frustration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepolicy issuance accuracyVSAvoidpolicy delivery speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements automated feedback loops between the illustration generation engine, underwriting system, and policy issuance processes. Data flows automatically between these stages with validation checks that prevent errors from propagating, maintaining reliability while accelerating the process through electronic rather than manual handoffs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical processes (physical document handling, manual data entry, paper-based underwriting) with electronic automated systems. This substitution eliminates human error in data transcription and processing while maintaining the necessary validation and approval steps, significantly improving both accuracy and speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Measurement precision

If legacy third-party vendor system is used, then policy illustrations can be produced, but device complexity and resource requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveillustration generation capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the illustration generation capability directly into the advisor's existing workstation and policy management software. By combining these functions into a single integrated system rather than using separate external vendor systems, the patent reduces overall system complexity while maintaining full illustration generation capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS12260461B2Interface screens for use with straight through processing (“STP”)
Publication Date: 2025.03.25 BANK OF AMERICA CORP
  • US12260461B2 patent drawing
  • US12260461B2 patent drawing
  • US12260461B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Apparatus and methods for providing an electronic environment for enabling straight through processing (“STP”) of an advisor/client-adopted-illustration are provided. The environment includes a workstation. An interface screen is located on the workstation. The interface screen displays multiple illustrations. The interface screen may distinguish the differences between the two illustrations from like portions of the two illustrations. The interface screen may juxtapose, on the display, like portions of the two illustrations. An environment condition may include a requirement that each of the two illustrations includes a signature from the client. The environment may also include a communications module for transmitting an illustration request to a remote server, which may determine whether an advisor-selected characterization of the illustration is correct. If incorrect, then the remote server may re-characterize the illustration and transmit the re-characterized illustration to the workstation such that the advisor-selected characterization and the recharacterization are displayed together on the interface.