Straddle Three-Wheeled Vehicle Frame Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current frame designs for straddle-type three-wheeled vehicles are either complex and material-intensive or lack the necessary strength for high-speed road use, and they do not adequately accommodate the unique space constraints and stability requirements of three-wheeled vehicles.

Innovation Solution

A frame design featuring an upper and lower frame member interconnected by forward and rearward cross members, with a strut extending diagonally to provide additional strength and attachment points, accommodating a double A-arm front suspension and a swing arm rear suspension, allowing for efficient mounting of components like the engine, air box, and fuel tank while maintaining accessibility.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If a space frame or ladder frame is used, then the frame provides sufficient strength and rigidity, but the frame becomes complex and uses a large amount of material

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveframe strengthVSAvoidframe complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The frame is divided into two main longitudinal members (left and right) that are simpler in structure, with cross members and bracing elements added only where structurally necessary. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently, reducing overall complexity while maintaining strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The longitudinal frame members serve multiple functions: they provide structural strength, act as mounting points for suspension components, and serve as attachment points for body panels and other vehicle components. This multi-functionality reduces the need for additional separate structural elements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Strength

If high strength metal alloys are used to increase frame strength, then the frame strength increases, but the manufacturing cost increases and additional processing steps are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveframe strengthVSAvoidmanufacturing ease
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the structural parameters of the frame (geometry, member distribution, bracing configuration) rather than relying solely on material parameter changes (high-strength alloys). This allows achieving the required strength through optimized structural design using conventional materials, avoiding costly materials and complex heat treatment processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If the frame is designed for four-wheeled ATVs with McPherson suspension, then the frame structure is simpler, but it cannot adequately control roll and sway for three-wheeled vehicles

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveframe simplicityVSAvoidvehicle stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The frame design incorporates asymmetric bracing and cross member placement that is specifically tailored for three-wheeled vehicle geometry. The longitudinal members and cross members are positioned to optimize the triangular configuration inherent in three-wheeled vehicles, providing superior roll and sway control compared to symmetric four-wheeled ATV frame designs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

4Volume of moving object

If three-wheeled vehicles are used, then the vehicle configuration is more compact, but there is reduced space to accommodate components in the rear portion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle volumeVSAvoidcomponent space
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The frame design utilizes vertical space and three-dimensional positioning to accommodate components. The longitudinal members are positioned to create optimized volume distribution, allowing engine, transmission, and other components to be arranged in a compact three-dimensional configuration rather than being constrained to two-dimensional layouts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS7806215B2Straddle-type wheeled vehicle and frame thereof
Publication Date: 2010.10.05 BOMBARDIER RECREATIONAL PROD INC
  • US7806215B2 patent drawing
  • US7806215B2 patent drawing
  • US7806215B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A straddle-type three-wheeled vehicle has a frame having an upper frame member, a lower frame member, a forward cross member interconnecting a forward portion of the upper frame member with a forward portion of the lower frame member, and a rearward cross member interconnecting a rearward portion of the upper frame member with a rearward portion of the lower frame member. A strut extends diagonally from the forward cross member to the lower frame member. The vehicle has an engine mounted to the frame. An air box of the vehicle has at least a portion thereof disposed above at least a portion of the engine. A fuel tank of the vehicle is disposed rearwardly of the air box.