Self-Balancing Vehicle Strain Gauge Steering Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Two-wheeled self-balancing electric vehicles face issues with safety and reliability due to complex balance and steering control systems, including numerous moving parts and manufacturing complexity, which hinder customizability and efficiency.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of strain gauge systems to detect rider-induced strain on a rigid platform, allowing for precise control of yaw movements and rider presence detection, enabling simpler and more reliable self-balancing mechanisms.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If complex balance and steering control systems are used, then vehicle stability and control precision are improved, but device complexity and manufacturing complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle stabilityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the balance control and steering control functions into a single integrated control system. The rigid platform with rigidly coupled foot placement sections merges the previously separate balance and steering mechanisms, reducing device complexity while maintaining both vehicle stability and control precision through unified sensor and motor control architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The rigid platform structure serves multiple functions simultaneously: it provides the mounting structure for sensors, transmits rider input forces for both balance and steering control, and acts as the structural framework for the entire vehicle. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate components, thereby reducing manufacturing complexity while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Measurement precision

If numerous moving parts are included in the control system, then control precision is improved, but ease of manufacture and reliability worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol precisionVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates unnecessary moving parts from the control system by using a rigid platform structure. Instead of using multiple movable components to detect rider position and intent, the system uses strain gauges on the rigid platform to directly sense rider forces, simplifying manufacturing while maintaining control precision through direct force measurement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces complex mechanical linkages and moving parts with electronic sensing elements (strain gauges) mounted on the rigid platform. This substitution eliminates the need for mechanical transmission components while maintaining measurement precision through direct electrical sensing of rider-induced strains.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Device complexity

If a rigid platform with rigidly coupled foot placement sections is used, then device complexity is reduced, but adaptability to different rider preferences worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural complexityVSAvoidcustomizability of riding characteristics
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic control parameters that can be adjusted in real-time based on rider characteristics and preferences. The control system continuously adapts the aggressiveness of balance control and steering response by processing strain gauge data to determine rider weight and intent, allowing the rigid platform structure to accommodate different riding styles through software-based parameter adjustment rather than mechanical modification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent enables customization of riding characteristics by changing control parameters such as balance control aggressiveness, steering sensitivity, and motor response thresholds. These parameters are dynamically adjusted based on rider weight detection and user preferences, allowing the same rigid platform structure to provide personalized riding experiences without requiring physical modifications to the hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution enhances safety by automatically adjusting balance control aggressiveness based on rider weight and provides intuitive, customizable ride experiences while reducing manufacturing complexity and costs.

Implementation Method 1

a first strain gauge attached to the platform and configured to sense twisting strain in the platform induced by imbalanced forces exerted upon the first and second foot placement sections

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectStrain gauge sensing: Piezoresistive Effect

Implementation Method 2

a balance position sensor attached to the platform and configured to sense inclination of the platform

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInclination sensing: Accelerometer

Implementation Method 3

a first drive motor configured to drive the first wheel, and a second drive motor configured to drive the second wheel, wherein the drive motors are configured to drive the wheels toward self-balancing the platform

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic conversion: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS10286972B2Self-balancing electric vehicle with strain-based controls
Publication Date: 2019.05.14 FOCUS DESIGNS INC
  • US10286972B2 patent drawing
  • US10286972B2 patent drawing
  • US10286972B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A self-balancing electric vehicle may include an elongate platform having a first foot placement section and a second foot placement section rigidly coupled to each other, a first and second wheel being respectively coupled to opposite ends of the platform. Rider presence and turning intentions may be determined based on strain induced in the platform by the rider. The strain may be detected by one or more strain gauge systems. One of the strain gauge systems may be configured for use in a steering control circuit, and may include a strain gauge sensor mounted diagonally with respect to a long axis of the platform, such that the strain gauge detects only twist-induced strain.