Strain Gauge Virtual Sensor for Injection Molding Pressure Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current indirect sensors for measuring pressure within a mold cavity during injection molding, such as strain gauge sensors, often require downtime for installation, are expensive, and may not be optimally placed, leading to suboptimal pressure monitoring and potential mold damage due to excessive pressure.

Innovation Solution

Mounting strain gauge sensors on the exterior of a mold surface adjacent to the parting line, in conjunction with a virtual cavity sensor, to approximate pressure conditions within the mold cavity and adjust the injection molding process when pre-set trigger points are exceeded, ensuring optimal pressure control without direct contact with the mold cavity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If direct sensors are placed within the mold cavity to measure pressure, then measurement precision is improved, but the high gloss finish of the parts is marred and manufacturing precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure measurementVSAvoidsurface finish quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses an intermediary indirect sensing system that measures mold cavity pressure without direct contact with the part surface. The sensor system includes a sensor positioned outside the mold cavity that detects pressure through the mold wall or via strain measurements on the mold, thereby preserving the high gloss finish while still providing accurate pressure data for process control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a virtual representation of the pressure conditions inside the mold cavity by measuring external parameters (such as strain on the mold or pressure at accessible locations) and using these measurements to infer the internal pressure state. This copying approach allows pressure monitoring without physical intrusion into the cavity that would mar the part surface

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Manufacturing precision

If indirect sensors are used to avoid maring the part surface, then surface finish quality is improved, but sensor placement options are limited and installation requires downtime

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface finish qualityVSAvoidsensor installation
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the sensing function from the mold cavity interior, placing sensors on external surfaces or at accessible locations on the mold. This segmentation allows the sensing system to be installed independently without requiring mold disassembly or downtime, while still providing the needed pressure measurement capability through indirect detection methods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Ease of operation

If strain gauge sensors are mounted on the exterior of the mold adjacent to the parting line, then ease of installation is improved and surface finish is preserved, but measurement precision for cavity pressure is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensor installationVSAvoidcavity pressure measurement
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback-based virtual sensing system where external strain gauge measurements are continuously monitored and processed to infer internal cavity pressure conditions. The system uses algorithms that correlate external strain patterns with internal pressure states, providing real-time feedback control that compensates for the indirect measurement approach and maintains effective measurement precision for process control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the measurement parameters from direct pressure sensing inside the cavity to external strain measurement on the mold. By measuring strain (deformation) on the mold exterior and using the known mechanical properties of the mold material, the system calculates the internal pressure state, transforming the measurement approach while maintaining operational effectiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution allows for real-time pressure monitoring and adjustment, preventing mold damage by approximating pressure conditions and maintaining optimal pressure levels, even in molds with high L/t ratios, thereby improving the quality and efficiency of the injection molding process.

Implementation Method 1

The strain gauge sensor or sensors measures surface strain of the mold

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectStrain measurement: Deformation

Data Source

PatentUS10449707B2Method of injection molding using one or more strain gauges as a virtual sensor
Publication Date: 2019.10.22 PROCTER & GAMBLE CO
  • US10449707B2 patent drawing
  • US10449707B2 patent drawing
  • US10449707B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A injection molding method involves measuring, using at least one strain gauge sensor, a change in strain in a mold side of a mold cavity, approximating a pressure within the mold cavity based on the change in strain, comparing the approximated pressure to a pre-set trigger point, and if the approximated pressure equals or exceeds the pre-set trigger point, activating a virtual cavity sensor having an optimal pre-defined pressure-time curve, wherein upon activation, the virtual cavity sensor tracks approximated pressures calculated from the change in strain measurements measured by the at least one strain gauge sensor over time and compares the results of the approximated pressure tracking to the optimal pre-defined pressure-time curve.