Fluid Strainer Basket and Lid Interlock for Fast Servicing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing strainer devices require multiple bolts for assembly, leading to time-consuming servicing and excessive back pressure due to inadequate flow paths and turbulence.

Innovation Solution

A fluid strainer with a single strainer basket and a mechanical interlock mechanism, utilizing pneumatic pressure for sealing and a tab-and-slot arrangement to secure the lid, minimizing the need for fasteners and enhancing fluid flow while reducing turbulence.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If multiple bolts are used to secure the strainer housing cover, then the sealing reliability is improved, but the servicing time and device complexity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesealing reliabilityVSAvoidservicing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The sealing function is segmented from the mechanical fastening function. The housing cover is divided into a sealing portion and a fastening portion, allowing independent optimization of each function without requiring multiple bolts for both sealing and securing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The sealing function is extracted from the bolted connection system and implemented through a dedicated sealing structure (such as a lip seal or gasket system) that operates independently from the single retaining bolt, eliminating the need for multiple fasteners while maintaining reliable sealing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Reliability

If multiple bolts are used to secure the strainer housing cover, then the sealing reliability is improved, but the device complexity and assembly difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesealing reliabilityVSAvoidfastening system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The sealing structure is merged with the housing cover itself, forming an integrated sealing system that eliminates the need for separate gaskets and multiple fasteners. The lip seal design incorporates the sealing function directly into the cover geometry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The complex multi-bolt fastening system is replaced by extracting the essential function (securing the cover) and implementing it through a single retaining bolt, while the sealing function is handled by a dedicated sealing structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Ease of manufacture

If a conventional strainer basket design is used, then the manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but the fluid flow path creates excessive turbulence and back pressure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidturbulence and back pressure
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The strainer basket incorporates curved or tapered surfaces instead of sharp edges and abrupt transitions. The curved geometry guides fluid flow smoothly through the basket, reducing turbulence and back pressure while maintaining manufacturing feasibility through standard forming processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Solution Approach 2:

The strainer basket design applies different geometric characteristics to different regions: the inlet region features smooth curved surfaces to guide flow entry, the mid-section has optimized wire spacing and curvature for filtration, and the outlet region incorporates tapered surfaces to maintain flow velocity and reduce back pressure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Productivity

If the strainer chamber is not emptied frequently, then the productivity is maintained, but the back pressure increases and system failures occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontinuous operation capabilityVSAvoidback pressure
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The quick-release mechanism enables the strainer to be serviced quickly and easily, encouraging frequent emptying and maintenance. The system essentially services itself through simple operator intervention rather than requiring complex automated cleaning mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Facilitates quick and efficient servicing by eliminating the need for multiple fasteners, reduces turbulence, and ensures a smooth fluid flow path.

Implementation Method 1

a pneumatic apparatus coupled to the interior chamber to provide a firm seal at the gasket

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPneumatic pressure: Pressure Increase

Data Source

PatentUS20250375723A1Fluid strainer
Publication Date: 2025.12.11 BLUE SKIES GLOBAL LLC
  • US20250375723A1 patent drawing
  • US20250375723A1 patent drawing
  • US20250375723A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A fluid strainer that is meant to remove debris from the flow of fluid through a strainer and that includes a housing having inlet and outlet ports. The housing defines an interior chamber through which the fluid flows. The fluid strainer including a single strainer basked disposed within the housing chamber. The strainer basket has open input end into which the fluid flows from the housing inlet and opposed side walls that extend in the direction of the fluid. The strainer basked further includes an open output end that is comprised of a pair of tapered output wall that direct the fluid flow to the housing outlet port. The strainer housing also includes a side inlet pipe for receiving filtration media.