Strand Guide Device with Curved Channel for Axial Stability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional guide devices for cable strands in civil engineering structures allow axial movement and stress sensitivity under load and voltage variations, leading to instability.

Innovation Solution

A guide device with a bilateral support mechanism featuring a curved channel and specific first and second faces that induce jamming, utilizing a removable element to prevent longitudinal displacement and enhance strand fixation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional guide devices with simple channels are used, then the device complexity is low, but the strands can move axially and are sensitive to stresses under load variations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestrand position stabilityVSAvoidguide device structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The guide device channel is segmented into multiple functional zones: a first zone with a first face for lateral support, a second zone with a second face for axial constraint, and a third zone with a third face for additional stabilization. This segmentation allows each zone to address specific instability issues independently, improving overall strand position stability without requiring complete redesign of the entire channel structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different zones of the channel are given different geometric properties tailored to local requirements: the first face provides lateral support with specific orientation, the second face constrains axial movement with its inclined geometry, and the third face offers additional stabilization. This local differentiation of channel properties addresses specific instability mechanisms at each location along the strand path.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If conventional single-face support channels are used, then the manufacturing is simple, but the strands are sensitive to stress variations and axial movement occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestrand fixationVSAvoidchannel formation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The channel is divided into multiple support faces (first, second, and third faces) with distinct orientations and functions. This segmentation improves strand fixation by providing multi-directional constraint, but requires more complex formwork or molding processes during manufacturing, increasing production complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The channel incorporates curved and inclined surfaces rather than simple flat or circular cross-sections. The first face, second face, and third face are arranged with specific curvatures and angles to optimize strand contact and constraint. These curved geometries improve fixation reliability but require more sophisticated manufacturing techniques compared to simple circular channels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

3Strength

If conventional circular channels are used, then the device structure is simple, but lateral support and stress distribution are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelateral support capacityVSAvoidchannel cross-section
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The channel cross-section is designed with non-uniform properties: the first face, second face, and third face have different orientations, angles, and contact surface areas. This local differentiation optimizes lateral support capacity by directing support forces to specific regions where strands require constraint, rather than providing uniform support around the entire circumference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The channel cross-section departs from symmetry by incorporating inclined faces (first, second, and third faces) with different angles and orientations relative to the strand axis. This asymmetric geometry provides targeted lateral support and stress distribution, improving the channel's ability to resist strand movement in critical directions while maintaining structural simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The guide device effectively maintains strand position and reduces axial movement, minimizing stress-induced instability and ensuring secure lateral support.

Implementation Method 1

oriented so as to form between them a predetermined angle A at least sufficient to initiate a jamming phenomenon of the strand when it receives a tension

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentEP2007947B1Strand guide device
Publication Date: 2014.05.14 VSL INT AG
  • EP2007947B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2007947B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2007947B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Guide device (1) for strands (2), the guide device (1) including a body (5) in which a curved channel (6) is provided, including a longitudinal axis (7) curved along the curve of said channel (6) and a first part (8) which, mainly located on the side of the lower surface of the longitudinal axis (7), enables, subject to the length of the channel (6), the strand (2) to be supported on at least one portion of the peripheral surface (10) presented by said strand (2).