Automated Strategy Grouping for Trading Systems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In the complex realm of stock and option contracts, users face difficulties in understanding aggregate positions and formulating trades due to intricate interrelationships, especially when dealing with multiple legs, and managing spread holdings becomes challenging as the composition of strategies changes.

Innovation Solution

An automated strategy grouping system that determines possible strategies from individual instruments, groups them into standard strategies, and selects the most desirable grouping based on user criteria, allowing for easier monitoring and trading of strategies as single instruments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If users manually manage individual stock and option contracts, then they maintain precise control over each instrument, but they face difficulty understanding aggregate positions and formulating trades due to complex interrelationships

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveUnderstanding aggregate positionsVSAvoidComplexity of instrument interrelationships
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges multiple individual stock and option contracts into grouped strategies based on their interrelationships. By automatically identifying and grouping instruments that are connected through options contracts (where the option's underlying stock is in the user's portfolio), the system presents aggregate positions and strategy-level views rather than requiring users to manually analyze each individual instrument's complex interactions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary layer between individual instruments and user decision-making. This intermediary automatically formulates standard strategy combinations (such as covered calls, protective puts, etc.) from the underlying instruments, providing users with pre-packaged strategy views that simplify understanding of aggregate positions without losing the ability to drill down to individual instrument details when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If users manually formulate trades with multiple legs, then they can customize each trade precisely, but they must figure out standard combinations by hand which is time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveTrade formulation speedVSAvoidTime to figure out standard combinations
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by automatically formulating standard strategy combinations before the user needs to execute trades. When users add instruments to their portfolio, the system proactively identifies possible standard strategy groupings (such as covered calls, protective puts, vertical spreads) and presents them ready for review and execution, eliminating the need for users to manually work through the combinatorial process of figuring out standard combinations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides universal trade formulation capabilities that work across different instrument types and strategy configurations. The automated grouping system handles multiple standard strategy patterns (covered calls, protective puts, spreads, etc.) through a unified interface, allowing users to formulate trades consistently regardless of the specific combination of stocks and options involved, thereby improving productivity across diverse trading scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If users track spread holdings manually, then they can monitor each position individually, but the ability to formulate and track spread holdings becomes difficult as the make-up of possible component strategies changes

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveTracking accuracyVSAvoidChanging strategy composition
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements dynamic tracking that automatically adapts as portfolio composition changes. When users add or remove instruments, the system dynamically recalculates and updates the available strategy groupings and spread compositions. This dynamic approach maintains reliable tracking of spread holdings by continuously monitoring the underlying instruments that make up each spread strategy and automatically adjusting the groupings to reflect current portfolio state, eliminating the need for manual reconfiguration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS8577788B1Automatic strategy grouping for a trading system
Publication Date: 2013.11.05 MORGAN STANLEY SERVICES GROUP INC
  • US8577788B1 patent drawing
  • US8577788B1 patent drawing
  • US8577788B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for trading comprises a processor and a memory. The processor is configured to: receive an indication to automatically group a set of investment instruments; determine a set of possible strategies from the set of investment instruments; determine a set of groupings of strategies from the set of possible strategies; and determine one or more selected groupings from the set of groupings of strategies based at least in part on a selection criteria. The memory is coupled to the processor and configured to provide the processor instructions.