Stratified Composite Portfolio System for Non-Systematic Risk Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current portfolio construction methods fail to effectively manage the complexity and heterogeneity of modern investment portfolios, lacking tools to systematically control for non-systematic risks and achieve predictable returns due to inadequate risk controls and classification systems.

Innovation Solution

A stratified or segmented composite portfolio system that uses functional attributes to segment investment securities into risk groups, allowing for targeted weighting and risk management by assigning specific weights to risk groups to achieve engineered risk objectives.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If portfolio construction methods use traditional classification systems, then portfolio management becomes simpler, but the ability to systematically control non-systematic risks deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveportfolio management simplicityVSAvoidrisk control effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments investment securities into multiple strata based on functional attributes (e.g., industry, geography, business model). Each stratum represents a distinct risk category, allowing systematic control of non-systematic risks while maintaining manageable complexity through hierarchical organization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces functional attributes as new parameters for classification, moving beyond traditional classification systems. By tagging securities with multiple functional attributes and organizing them into strata based on these parameters, the system achieves both systematic risk control and operational efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If portfolio construction methods increase segmentation and stratification, then risk control effectiveness improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverisk control effectivenessVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the portfolio into multiple strata based on functional attributes, creating a hierarchical structure that systematically controls risks. This segmentation improves risk control by isolating non-systematic risks within specific strata while maintaining overall portfolio coherence through the hierarchical framework.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal stratification framework that can be applied across different portfolio types and asset classes. The functional attribute tagging system serves multiple purposes: risk classification, performance attribution, and portfolio construction, reducing complexity despite increased segmentation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Device complexity

If traditional portfolio methods are used, then system simplicity is maintained, but the ability to achieve predictable returns deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoidreturn predictability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces functional attributes as new parameters for organizing and analyzing investment securities. By tagging securities with attributes such as industry, geography, and business model, the system enables more predictable return estimation through stratified analysis while maintaining manageable complexity through systematic parameter organization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS9646075B2Segmentation and stratification of data entities in a database system
Publication Date: 2017.05.09 LOCUS
  • US9646075B2 patent drawing
  • US9646075B2 patent drawing
  • US9646075B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A stratified or segmented composite data structure can be formed by selecting a group of data entities, stratifying or segmenting them according to attributes, and assigning relative weights to the components based on their stratified or segmented positions. The attributes are selected from a universe of possible values. Further positive and negative biases can be applied at any arbitrary point or position, including to individual data entities, groups of arbitrarily selected data entities, or arbitrary positions.