Stratigraphic Forward Modeling for Synthetic AI Training Data

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for integrating stratigraphic processes in 3D modeling are tedious, manual, and time-consuming, and require large amounts of multiscale training datasets for AI and ML algorithms, which are not feasible with real interpreted well logs or 3D seismic data.

Innovation Solution

A synthetic data set is generated using process mimicking algorithms at the reservoir scale, creating labeled 3D stratigraphic models with various geological and petrophysical properties, which can be used to train AI and ML algorithms.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If conventional manual workflows are used for stratigraphic interpretation from well logs and seismic data, then the process can be performed with existing tools, but the workflow becomes tedious, manual, and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation of stratigraphic interpretationVSAvoidtime required for manual interpretation
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates synthetic copies of real well logs, seismic data, and facies models through forward stratigraphic modeling. These synthetic datasets replicate the characteristics of real subsurface data while being generated from known ground truth models, enabling automated AI/ML training without requiring extensive manual interpretation of actual field data

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary stratigraphic modeling and data synthesis before actual interpretation tasks. By pre-generating comprehensive synthetic datasets with known answers and diverse geological scenarios, the system prepares training materials in advance that enable rapid automated interpretation without time-consuming manual workflows during actual operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If AI and ML algorithms are used to automate stratigraphic processes, then productivity increases, but large amounts of multiscale training datasets are required which are not feasible with real interpreted data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveefficiency of stratigraphic interpretationVSAvoidamount of training data required
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent generates synthetic copies of multiscale subsurface data including well logs, seismic volumes, and facies models through forward stratigraphic modeling. These synthetic datasets provide the large volumes of multiscale training data required for AI/ML algorithms while avoiding the limitations of real interpreted data, enabling efficient automated stratigraphic interpretation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system varies multiple parameters in the forward stratigraphic modeling process including geological time steps, depositional environments, facies properties, and structural configurations. This parameter variation generates diverse synthetic datasets covering multiple scales and geological scenarios, providing comprehensive training data for AI/ML algorithms without requiring equivalent volumes of real interpreted data

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If real interpreted well logs and 3D seismic data are used for training AIML engines, then the training data reflects actual subsurface conditions, but the datasets are limited by sampling bias and user bias

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of training data representationVSAvoiddiversity and completeness of training data
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates synthetic copies of subsurface data through forward modeling that replicate real geological processes and data characteristics while eliminating biases present in real interpreted data. These synthetic datasets maintain realistic relationships between geological features and measurement data while providing complete coverage without sampling limitations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of interpreting real data to create training sets (forward approach), the system inverts the process by first generating known ground truth stratigraphic models, then simulating the acquisition of well logs and seismic data from these models. This backward approach ensures complete knowledge of the underlying geology and eliminates interpretation biases inherent in traditional workflows

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

4Ease of operation

If traditional manual stratigraphic modeling methods are used, then the process can be performed with existing expertise, but the workflow is isolated and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of existing workflowsVSAvoidtime required for integrated stratigraphic modeling
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges forward stratigraphic modeling, synthetic data generation, and AI/ML training into an integrated automated workflow. By combining these previously separate processes into a unified system that automatically generates training data and trains interpretation models, the system eliminates the isolated, time-consuming nature of traditional workflows while maintaining operational simplicity through automation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS12242013B2Stratigraphic forward modeling platform and methods of use
Publication Date: 2025.03.04 SCHLUMBERGER TECH CORP
  • US12242013B2 patent drawing
  • US12242013B2 patent drawing
  • US12242013B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A process mimicking forward modeler with deposition and erosion at each specific geological time step. The 3D derived properties are high resolution depositional environments and rock properties that are used to generate multiscale labelled synthetic data. These synthetic data can range from 1D logs such as grain size, gamma ray, density, and velocity, to 3D synthetic seismic, and are used directly as training data for various AIML applications.