Straw Bale Noise Barrier with Drainage Base and Protective Roof

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing noise protection walls are either complex and expensive to erect and dismantle, or they lack durability due to weathering, particularly those made of straw which are cheap to install but not durable.

Innovation Solution

A noise protection wall design using straw bales with a water-draining base layer, a self-supporting structure without a concrete foundation, and a roof substructure that prevents rain and snow penetration, along with densely packed straw bales for improved sound absorption, allowing for easy erection and dismantling while enhancing durability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If noise protection walls are made of concrete elements or ring stones, then durability is improved, but erection and dismantling become complex and expensive

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovedurabilityVSAvoiderection complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The noise protection wall is divided into modular components: a reusable frame structure and replaceable filling material (straw bales). This segmentation allows the frame to be erected once and reused, while the filling material can be easily installed and removed, resolving the contradiction between durability and erection complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention combines a durable frame structure (made of steel or wood) with a temporary filling material (straw bales). This composite approach allows the permanent frame to provide structural integrity and reusability, while the temporary filling provides noise absorption that can be easily replaced, addressing both durability and ease of dismantling requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Ease of manufacture

If noise protection walls are made of straw bundles, then erection cost is reduced, but durability deteriorates due to weathering

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerection costVSAvoiddurability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system separates the durable frame structure from the temporary straw filling. The frame serves as a permanent, weather-resistant skeleton that can be reused across multiple projects, while the straw bales serve as temporary, inexpensive infill that can be replaced annually. This segmentation resolves the contradiction by assigning different durability requirements to different components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The straw bales are designed to be temporary and replaceable (discarded after one season), while the frame structure is recovered and reused for the next noise protection wall. This approach allows inexpensive, easy-to-install materials to be used for the temporary filling while the durable frame provides long-term value through reuse.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

3Device complexity

If straw bales are used without a frame, then structure simplicity is improved, but stability against weathering deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural simplicityVSAvoidweathering resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The frame structure acts as a protective shell or envelope around the straw bales, shielding them from direct exposure to weathering elements like rain, wind, and sun. This protective enclosure maintains the simplicity of the overall structure while significantly improving the weathering resistance of the straw filling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Solution Approach 2:

The combination of the weather-resistant frame (steel or wood) with the organic straw bales creates a composite structure where the frame provides environmental protection while the straw provides acoustic functionality. This composite approach resolves the contradiction between structural simplicity and weathering resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Stability of the object's composition

If a concrete foundation is used, then stability is improved, but ease of dismantling deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestabilityVSAvoiddismantling ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The foundation system is segmented into a permanent base layer (gravel or soil preparation) and a removable frame structure. The base layer provides stable ground preparation that remains in place, while the frame structure above it can be easily assembled and disassembled without disturbing the foundation, resolving the contradiction between stability and dismantling ease.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The concrete foundation element is extracted and replaced with a simpler base layer preparation (gravel or compacted soil). This extraction removes the permanent, difficult-to-dismantle concrete component while maintaining adequate stability through proper ground preparation, allowing the frame structure to be freely assembled and removed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enables a cost-effective, durable noise protection wall that can be easily constructed and dismantled without the need for concrete foundations, with improved sound insulation and resistance to weathering, making it suitable for long-term use and environmentally friendly.

Implementation Method 1

a base layer with a water-draining function

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectWater drainage: Gravitation

Implementation Method 2

a roof which prevents rain or snow from penetrating the straw bales via the crown of the wall

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhysical barrier protection: Physical Containment

Implementation Method 3

densely packed straw bales for improved sound absorption

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSound absorption: Acoustic Absorption

Data Source

PatentEP3594410B1Noise barrier and method of erecting same
Publication Date: 2021.03.24 HOLOCH MATTHIAS
  • EP3594410B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3594410B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3594410B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The present invention provides a noise barrier (1) comprising a plurality of straw bales (2) and a method for its construction. The base of the noise barrier (1) is formed by a base layer (3) with a water-repellent function, upon which a plurality of cuboid, unwrapped straw bales (2) are arranged in a brick bond to form a wall (M), with a roof arranged on a crown that closes off the top of the wall (M). The depth-to-height ratio of the wall (M) is between 1:2 and 1:3. The roof has a substructure comprising first structural elements (5) extending longitudinally along the noise barrier (1) and resting on the crown, which are attached to the wall (M) by means of fasteners. The fasteners are located at a predetermined height on the wall (M), which is at most one-third of the total height of the wall.The wall (M), positioned between two superimposed layers of straw bales, extends through the wall (M) and each encompasses at least the straw bales that are above the predetermined height of the wall (M) and at least one of the first construction elements (5).