Straw Chopper Assemblies for Uniform Residue Distribution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current straw chopper and spreader systems in grain harvesting combines fail to achieve uniform distribution of chopped residue across the swath, especially with wider headers, due to insufficient energy transfer and inefficient spread mechanisms, leading to reduced yield and increased soil erosion risks.

Innovation Solution

The straw chopper assemblies are located on either side of the rotor discharge, utilizing a curvilinear cage with a rotating knife assembly and stationary knives, which accelerate material to high speeds for efficient distribution across the header width, with adjustable hoods to control the spread pattern and prevent material egress into sensitive areas.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Length of moving object

If traditional spinning spreader disks are used at the rear of the combine, then the structure is simple, but the material cannot be flung sufficiently far to cover wide header swaths

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespread distanceVSAvoidchopper assembly complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The residue handling system is divided into separate functional modules: a straw chopper assembly positioned alongside the rotor discharge and a separate spreader assembly. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently - the chopper for cutting efficiency and the spreader for distribution distance - while together they solve the problem of covering wide swaths with adequate chop quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary curved guide surface in the chopper assembly that redirects the rotor-discharged material into the chopper knives. This intermediary element enables the chopper to receive material efficiently from the rotor while maintaining the kinetic energy needed for effective chopping and subsequent throwing, bridging the gap between the rotor discharge and the chopping action.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Manufacturing precision

If residue is dumped on spinning disks and flung outwardly, then the spread width can be increased, but the chop quality becomes insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechop uniformityVSAvoidspread width
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The material is chopped into smaller pieces before being thrown by the spreader assembly. The chopper assembly performs the preliminary cutting action on the residue as it passes through, ensuring that the material is reduced to appropriate length and uniformity. Only after this preliminary chopping does the spreader assembly distribute the material across the swath, guaranteeing both chop quality and spread width.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The chopper assembly is designed with movable components including adjustable stationary knives and a rotating chopper drum, allowing dynamic adjustment of chop length and intensity. This dynamic configuration enables optimization of chop uniformity for different crop types and conditions while maintaining the ability to spread material across wide swathes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If wider headers are used to increase harvesting width, then the header width increases, but the residue spreading becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveharvesting widthVSAvoidresidue spreading efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent positions the straw chopper assembly in a lateral dimension alongside the rotor discharge, rather than attempting to handle residue in the longitudinal direction. This dimensional repositioning allows the chopper to process residue immediately as it exits the rotor, while the spreader assembly handles the distribution in a separate lateral plane, effectively managing the increased width demands of wider headers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces traditional mechanical spreading mechanisms with a more sophisticated integrated chopper-spreader assembly that utilizes the kinetic energy of the rotor-discharged material. The curved guide surface and chopper knife arrangement convert the rotational energy into effective chopping and throwing action, reducing the need for additional power and simplifying operation despite wider header widths.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Productivity

If more powerful harvesters with wider headers are used, then the harvesting capacity increases, but the residue handling system requires more energy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveharvesting capacityVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The straw chopper assembly is designed to be self-powered by utilizing the kinetic energy already present in the material as it discharges from the rotor. The curved guide surface and chopper knife arrangement are configured to harvest this existing energy and convert it into the chopping and throwing action, eliminating the need for separate power sources and reducing overall energy consumption despite increased harvesting capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration ensures a uniform and wide distribution of chopped straw, reducing soil erosion and maintaining yield potential by effectively spreading residue beyond the combine's width without increasing power consumption, thus addressing the limitations of traditional systems.

Implementation Method 1

a curvilinear cage having an interior opening to accept the rotor discharged material, and an opening to distribute chopped straw outside of the harvesting combine. A rotating knife assembly is housed within each curvilinear cage. A stationary knife assembly is movable for the rotating knives to pass between adjacent pairs of stationary knives.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Force: Mechanical Force

Implementation Method 2

accelerate material to high speeds for efficient distribution across the header width

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCentrifugal Force: Centrifugal Force

Implementation Method 3

Hoods are located over each of the outlets to directing the discharged chopped straw onto the ground

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravitation: Gravitation

Data Source

PatentUS10244685B2Straw choppers for an articulated harvesting combine
Publication Date: 2019.04.02 TRIBINE IND LLC
  • US10244685B2 patent drawing
  • US10244685B2 patent drawing
  • US10244685B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Straw chopper assemblies are provided for a harvesting combine of the type having a rotor and cage threshing assembly. The straw chopper assemblies are located on each side of the rotor discharge for accepting material exiting the rotor. Each straw chopper assembly is formed from a curvilinear cage having and interior opening to accept the rotor discharged material, and an opening to distribute chopper straw outside of the harvesting combine. A rotating knife assembly is housed within each curvilinear cage. A stationary knife assembly is movable for the rotating knives to pass between adjacent pairs of stationary knives. Outlets are provided in material communication with the curvilinear cage openings for discharging chopped straw onto the ground adjacent to the harvesting combine. Hoods are located over each of the outlets to directing the discharged chopped straw onto the ground.