Straw Knot Crushing for High-Density Blow-In Insulation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods cannot produce an insulating material from straw that can be blown into cavities using conventional blowing machines to a suitable density of at least 90-130 kg/m³, as the structural resistance of straw knots limits compaction.

Innovation Solution

The method involves squeezing straw between counter-rotating rollers to crush the knots, followed by shredding to maintain fiber lengths, allowing for the production of an insulating material that can be compressed to over 100 kg/m³ when blown in, using a device with a squeezing device and downstream comminution to process the straw efficiently.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If straw is chopped alone, then processing is simple, but the insulation material cannot be injected to suitable compaction (at least 90-130 kg/m³)

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing simplicityVSAvoidcompaction density
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the straw processing into two distinct stages: chopping (segmenting the straw into smaller pieces) followed by knot crushing (breaking down the resistant knot structures). This two-stage segmentation approach allows each process to be optimized independently, achieving both ease of manufacture and suitable compaction density.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs preliminary action by performing chopping before knot crushing. The initial chopping prepares the straw by reducing its overall size and making the knots more accessible, which facilitates the subsequent crushing process and enables achieving target compaction density with conventional injection machines.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Device complexity

If straw knots are not crushed, then processing is simpler, but the material resists compaction to over 100 kg/m³ when blown in

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing complexityVSAvoidcompaction efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the taking out principle by specifically targeting and extracting the problematic knot structures from the straw material. The knot crusher is designed to selectively crush these resistant nodes while leaving the rest of the straw structure relatively intact, removing the primary obstacle to compaction without unnecessarily complicating the overall processing system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs parameter changes by modifying the physical state of the straw knots through mechanical crushing. The knot crusher applies controlled mechanical force to change the structural parameters of the knots, breaking them down into smaller, more compressible fragments that can be compacted to the required density when blown into cavities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If straw is shredded extensively, then compaction is improved, but fiber lengths are reduced compromising insulating properties

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompaction densityVSAvoidinsulating property
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by applying different levels of mechanical processing to different parts of the straw. The knot crusher specifically targets the knot regions with intensive crushing action, while the overall shredding is kept moderate to preserve fiber length. This localized approach ensures high compaction density at the knot locations without excessively reducing the insulating fiber structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs partial action by applying crushing force selectively to the knots rather than uniformly shredding the entire straw material. This partial action on the problematic knot structures achieves the necessary compaction improvement while avoiding excessive shredding that would compromise the insulating fiber lengths and overall thermal performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables the production of an insulating material that can be effectively blown into cavities with conventional machines, achieving densities between 100 and 150 kg/m³, while preserving the beneficial properties of straw as an insulating material.

Implementation Method 1

the straw is squeezed between at least two opposing, counter-rotating rollers... wherein the knots of the straw are squeezed during the squeezing

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompression: Compression

Implementation Method 2

a suction device (15) for conveying the straw through the crushing device

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPneumatic transport:

Data Source

PatentEP3601690B1Method and device for the production of blow-in insulation material made of straw
Publication Date: 2024.07.10 KASSECKERT LEOPOLD
  • EP3601690B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3601690B1 patent drawingFigure 2~4

AI summary

Process for manufacturing a blow-in insulation material (2) made of straw (3), comprising a processing step in which the straw (3) is crushed between rolls (10, 11, 2) in a crushing apparatus (7), a crushing nip in the crushing apparatus (7) being selected in such a way that the straw (3) nodes are crushed during the crushing operation.