Streaming Fabric Interface Protocol Conversion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional interconnect architectures in computing systems face challenges in scaling to meet increasing bandwidth demands and power efficiency, particularly as data rates rise, due to complexities in receiver decoding, latency, and the need for proprietary interfaces that hinder standardization and interoperability.

Innovation Solution

An improved scalable streaming interface is introduced, which bifurcates header and data packets into independent channels, reduces the number of logical write ports, and standardizes the interface to enable better pin count versus receiver decoding complexity, supporting high-bandwidth and low-latency data transfer across multiple protocols like PCIe and CXL.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional interconnect architectures are used to handle electrical communications, then existing infrastructure can be maintained, but bandwidth demands and power efficiency cannot be met as data rates rise

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovebandwidthVSAvoidpower efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The interface is segmented into independent header channel and data channel, allowing separate optimization of control signaling and data transfer paths. This segmentation enables the data channel to operate at high speeds for bandwidth while the header channel manages flow control independently, improving overall power efficiency by avoiding full receiver decoding of high-speed data streams.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If receiver decoding complexity is increased to handle higher data rates, then bandwidth demands can be met, but pin count versus receiver decoding complexity balance is disrupted

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovebandwidthVSAvoidreceiver decoding complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The header information is extracted and transmitted separately on the header channel before the data payload. This allows the receiver to decode and process headers at lower speeds independently of the high-speed data channel, reducing receiver decoding complexity while maintaining high bandwidth capability on the data channel.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Headers are transmitted and decoded in advance before the corresponding data payloads arrive. This preliminary action allows the receiver to prepare buffer spaces and routing information beforehand, simplifying the decoding of subsequent high-speed data streams and reducing overall receiver complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If proprietary interfaces are used to support multiple protocols, then protocol-specific optimization can be achieved, but standardization and interoperability are hindered

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotocol performanceVSAvoidinteroperability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The streaming fabric interface is designed as a universal protocol-agnostic layer that can carry multiple protocol types (PCIe, CXL, etc.) over the same physical interface. The header channel carries protocol-specific information while the data channel handles payload, allowing a single interface design to support multiple protocols and improve interoperability without sacrificing protocol optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Device complexity

If the number of logical write ports is reduced to simplify the interface, then standardization improves, but data transfer capability may be limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterface simplicityVSAvoiddata transfer capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The interface adds a temporal dimension by separating header and data transmission in time and space. Instead of using multiple simultaneous write ports, the system uses a single simplified write port that first receives headers (which contain addressing and control information) and then receives data payloads, achieving high data transfer capability through sequential processing rather than parallel port multiplication.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentEP4485220A1Streaming fabric interface
Publication Date: 2025.01.01 INTEL CORP
  • EP4485220A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4485220A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4485220A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

An interface for coupling an agent to a fabric supports a load/store interconnect protocol, where the I/O interconnect protocol includes a flit mode and a non-flit mode. A set of flit mode header formats are used when in the flit mode and a set of non-flit mode header formats are used when in the non-flit mode, the set of non-flit mode header formats including one or more non-flit mode fields. Interface logic determines that a link is trained to the non-flit mode and generates a header according to the set of flit mode header formats, where the header includes a field to indicate that a corresponding packet originated as a non-flit mode packet. One or more fields of the set of flit mode header formats are repurposed in the header to carry the one or more non-flit mode fields before sending the modified header over the interface.