Streaming Transaction Mechanism for Low-Latency Distributed Database Updates

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Transaction-based systems in distributed database systems are inefficient for low-latency data requirements, particularly in financial market pricing datasets that need real-time updates, as they require frequent opening and committing of transactions, which is computationally expensive and inefficient.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a streaming transaction mechanism that allows updates to be applied to datasets without incrementing the version number during the transaction, enabling real-time data access and aggregation of updates until the transaction is committed, thereby reducing computational overhead and improving latency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If frequent transactions are opened and committed to provide real-time data updates, then data freshness is improved, but computational cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata update speedVSAvoidcomputational cost
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-calculating and storing transaction snapshots at regular intervals. When real-time data is needed, the system can retrieve these pre-computed snapshots without needing to execute and commit a new transaction, thus providing fast data access while avoiding the computational overhead of frequent transaction commits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the transaction commit frequency based on data freshness requirements. For less time-critical data, snapshots are taken at standard transaction intervals. For time-critical data, the system can interpolate between snapshots or use change data capture to provide near-real-time views without committing transactions at maximum frequency, optimizing the balance between speed and computational cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Loss of time

If transaction commits are performed at the speed of data change to deliver real-time data, then data latency is reduced, but system efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata latencyVSAvoidsystem efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments data access into two paths: (1) For non-time-critical queries, use standard transaction commits at optimized intervals; (2) For time-critical queries, use snapshot retrieval and interpolation techniques. This segmentation allows the system to minimize latency only where necessary while maintaining high overall efficiency for the majority of queries.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates copies of transaction snapshots at regular intervals and stores them in a dedicated snapshot storage structure. When real-time data is needed, the system retrieves these pre-made copies rather than executing new transactions, significantly reducing latency for time-critical operations while avoiding the efficiency penalty of frequent commits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Reliability

If a transaction-based system is used to ensure data consistency, then data reliability is improved, but responsiveness to streaming updates deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata consistencyVSAvoidresponsiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by capturing and storing transaction snapshots at regular intervals while maintaining the integrity of the transaction-based system. These pre-captured snapshots provide a reliable baseline that can be quickly retrieved without compromising data consistency, enabling fast access while preserving reliability guarantees.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces snapshots as an intermediary layer between the transaction-based storage system and the data access layer. Snapshots provide a consistent view of data at specific points in time without requiring active transactions to be open, thus mediating between the reliability requirements of the transaction system and the speed requirements of real-time data access.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentEP4224334A1Processing streaming data in a transaction-based distributed database system
Publication Date: 2023.08.09 PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • EP4224334A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4224334A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4224334A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Techniques for implementing a streaming transaction in a transaction based data storage system is disclosed. In an embodiment, a server computer system stores a dataset comprising a plurality of files where the dataset comprises a corresponding version number. The server computer system receives a command to modify the dataset and, in response, starts a streaming transaction for the dataset. During the streaming transaction, the server computer system receives a plurality of updates to the dataset, wherein each of the plurality of updates modifies one or more files of the plurality of files. The server computer system executes the plurality of updates in the dataset without modifying the corresponding version number of the dataset. When the server computer system commits the streaming transaction to the dataset, the server computer system increments the corresponding version number of the dataset.