Stress-Condition Vision and Cognitive Testing System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current vision and cognitive testing methods do not effectively assess or train individuals under stress conditions, which are crucial for competitive athletics and other demanding activities, as they fail to account for the impact of physical and cognitive stress on visual and cognitive abilities.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that subject individuals to stress conditions, such as aerobic or anaerobic activities, while administering visual and cognitive tests before and after stress exposure to measure the effects on their abilities, using display devices for stimuli and input devices for responses, allowing for training to improve performance under stress.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional vision and cognitive tests are administered without stress conditions, then the testing process is simple and easy to administer, but the test results do not reflect the individual's visual and cognitive abilities under stress conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of vision and cognitive assessmentVSAvoidcomplexity of testing system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines stress-inducing activities (aerobic exercise, cognitive tasks) with vision and cognitive testing into a single integrated system. The testing system merges the stress induction component with the assessment component, allowing simultaneous administration of stress conditions and visual/cognitive tests without requiring separate testing sessions or complex coordination between multiple independent systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The testing system is designed to administer multiple types of tests (visual acuity, cognitive function, reaction time) under various stress conditions (physical exercise, mental fatigue) through a single multi-functional platform. The system can adapt to different test protocols and stress induction methods, making it universally applicable for assessing visual and cognitive abilities across diverse conditions and populations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If vision and cognitive tests are administered under stress conditions, then the test results accurately reflect performance under demanding conditions, but the testing process becomes more complex and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of test results under stressVSAvoidtime required for testing
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements continuous testing throughout the stress induction process, administering visual and cognitive tests at multiple time points (baseline, during stress, post-stress) without interrupting the stress condition. This continuous assessment approach captures dynamic changes in visual and cognitive function over time, providing comprehensive data on stress effects while efficiently utilizing the testing window.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs baseline testing before stress induction to establish reference values for each individual's visual and cognitive abilities. This preliminary action allows for personalized normalization of subsequent test results, enabling accurate detection of stress-induced changes while reducing the need for extensive control groups or repeated baseline measurements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Loss of information

If multiple tests are administered before and after stress conditions, then comprehensive baseline data and comparative analysis are obtained, but the testing protocol becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompleteness of test dataVSAvoidcomplexity of testing protocol
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the testing protocol into distinct modular segments: baseline testing phase, stress induction phase with intermittent testing, and post-stress assessment phase. Each segment contains specific test batteries tailored to that phase's objectives. This segmentation allows for systematic data collection across different conditions while enabling flexible adaptation of individual test components without overwhelming complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates real-time feedback mechanisms where test results from each phase inform subsequent testing decisions. Baseline performance data feeds into the stress condition testing protocol, and post-stress results provide feedback on the magnitude and duration of stress effects. This feedback loop optimizes the testing protocol by adapting test selection and parameters based on accumulated data, reducing unnecessary tests while maintaining comprehensive assessment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10155148B2Vision and cognition testing and/or training under stress conditions
Publication Date: 2018.12.18 NIKE INC
  • US10155148B2 patent drawing
  • US10155148B2 patent drawing
  • US10155148B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The visual and cognitive skills of a subject may be tested and/or trained by providing a visual stimulus to a subject. More particularly, a subject may be tested and/or trained when under a stress condition to determine the effect of a stress condition, such as a physical stress or a cognitive stress, on the subject's visual and sensory skills. A response may be received from a subject via an input device, the appropriateness of which may depend upon the stimulus provided to the subject. Behavioral information and other data regarding the performance of a subject and the possible effect of the stress condition may be recorded. Scoring may be based upon the speed, accuracy, and other aspects of the performance of a subject.