Stretched Polymer Laminates for Ballistic Armor

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current transparent armor materials are heavy and lack sufficient ballistic impact resistance for eye and face protection in military and law enforcement applications, with existing lightweight options suffering from poor optical properties and high weight, and existing technologies face challenges in commercializing high-performance transparent materials.

Innovation Solution

The development of axially stretched polymer film laminates with heat fusible layers, where the core polymer film layers are coated with thinner heat fusible layers that bond under specific temperature and pressure conditions, enhancing both ballistic resistance and optical clarity by preventing plane strain deformation and maintaining tensile strength.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If monolithic transparent polymers like polycarbonate are used for eye and face protection, then optical transparency is maintained, but ballistic impact resistance is insufficient compared to fiber reinforced composites

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveballistic impact resistanceVSAvoidprotection level for eye and face
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies composite materials by combining multiple layers of transparent polymers with different properties. Specifically, it uses a hard transparent polymer layer (providing scratch resistance and structural integrity) combined with a soft transparent polymer layer (providing impact energy absorption). This composite structure achieves ballistic impact resistance comparable to fiber reinforced composites while maintaining optical transparency and preventing the harmful factor of insufficient protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Strength

If fiber reinforced polymer composites are used for ballistic protection, then impact resistance on a weight basis is greatly improved, but optical transparency is completely lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact resistanceVSAvoidoptical transparency
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSIllumination intensity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a transparent composite material system that combines hard and soft transparent polymers in specific layer configurations. This allows achieving high impact resistance (comparable to fiber composites) while maintaining 100% optical transparency, as both constituent polymers are transparent and the interface between layers is optimized to minimize light scattering.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by assigning different functional properties to different regions of the protective article. The hard polymer layer provides scratch resistance and structural stability, while the soft polymer layer provides impact energy dissipation. Each layer is optimized for its specific function while both contribute to overall transparency, allowing the system to achieve fiber-composite-level protection without sacrificing optical clarity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Strength

If glass laminates are used for transparent armor, then ballistic resistance is improved, but weight and thickness increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveballistic resistanceVSAvoidweight of protective equipment
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses composite materials consisting of multiple transparent polymer layers with different hardness levels. This polymer-based composite system achieves ballistic resistance comparable to glass laminates but with significantly reduced weight and thickness, as polymers have lower density than glass while the multi-layer composite structure provides the necessary impact energy absorption and distribution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Weight of moving object

If plastic laminates are used for lightweight transparent protection, then weight is reduced and visibility is maintained, but ballistic impact resistance becomes too low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveweight of protective equipmentVSAvoidballistic impact resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms simple plastic laminates into advanced composite structures by combining hard transparent polymers with soft transparent polymers in specific layer configurations. This composite approach maintains the lightweight advantage (avoiding glass densities) while dramatically improving ballistic impact resistance through the synergistic interaction between the hard layer (structural integrity) and soft layer (impact energy absorption).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by creating regions with different mechanical properties within the transparent protective article. The hard polymer regions provide scratch resistance and structural stability, while the soft polymer regions provide impact energy dissipation. This localized functional differentiation achieves ballistic protection levels comparable to much heavier materials while maintaining lightweight construction and optical clarity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides lightweight, high-performance transparent armor with improved ballistic impact resistance and optical properties, achieving up to 30% weight savings and a 10-25% improvement in V50 ballistic performance compared to monolithic polycarbonate sheets, while maintaining non-brittle failure behavior across various thicknesses.

Implementation Method 1

bonded by heat fusible layers to one another, and the coated core polymer films are uniaxially oriented and stretched by 2× to 40×

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat fusion: Melting

Implementation Method 2

bonded under specific temperature and pressure conditions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure bonding: Compression

Implementation Method 3

maintaining tensile strength

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTensile strength: Tension

Implementation Method 4

uniaxially oriented and stretched by 2× to 40×

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOrientation:

Implementation Method 5

improved ballistic impact resistance

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImpact resistance: Impact Force

Implementation Method 6

preventing plane strain deformation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDeformation prevention: Deformation

Data Source

PatentUS11491769B2Impact-resistant lightweight polymeric laminates
Publication Date: 2022.11.08 FRONTIER PERFORMANCE POLYMERS CORP
  • US11491769B2 patent drawing
  • US11491769B2 patent drawing
  • US11491769B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Bonded polymeric film laminates comprising core polymer film layers individually coated on at least one side with a heat fusible polymer layer and fusion bonded together by the application of heat and pressure at a temperature at which each heat fusible polymer coating bonds together adjacent core polymer film layers, where the melting point or softening temperature of the heat fusible polymer is at least 3° C. below that of the core layer polymer, and the lamination temperature is at or above the melting point or softening temperature of the heat fusible coating polymer, where the heat fusible polymer coating layers are thinner than the core polymer film layers, where the coated core polymer film layers are uniaxially stretched by 2× to 40×, and the stretched coated core polymer film layers are cross-plied. Methods for forming the laminates, coated films from which the laminates are formed, and articles formed from the laminates are also disclosed.