Engine Stroke Determination via Intake Pressure Waveform Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional stroke determination methods in 4-cycle engines are time-consuming and prone to electrical noise interference, especially when comparing intake pressure magnitudes across varying engine speeds, making accurate and efficient stroke determination challenging.

Innovation Solution

A stroke determination unit and method that utilize a crankshaft sensor and intake pressure variation generating device to recognize patterns in combined intake pressure waveforms within specified crankshaft phases, reducing noise interference and computing load, and allowing for accurate stroke determination across different engine speeds.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If stroke determination is carried out based on magnitude relationship of intake pressures across all engine speed regions, then comprehensive stroke determination is achieved, but determination time becomes excessively long

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestroke determination accuracyVSAvoiddetermination time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the stroke determination process by engine speed regions. It divides the determination into a first determination for low-speed regions (below predetermined RPM) and a second determination for high-speed regions (above predetermined RPM). This segmentation allows each determination to use optimized methods suitable for its speed range, reducing overall determination time while maintaining accuracy across all regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically selects the determination method based on engine speed. When engine speed exceeds the predetermined value, it switches from the first determination method to the second determination method. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to use the most efficient method for the current operating condition, resolving the contradiction between comprehensive determination and time efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Device complexity

If stroke determination is based on comparing intake pressure magnitudes at particular points, then determination is simplified, but noise suppression becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetermination process complexityVSAvoidnoise suppression capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from one-dimensional point-based pressure comparison to two-dimensional waveform analysis. By analyzing the entire intake pressure waveform pattern across multiple crankshaft phases rather than comparing single-point magnitudes, the system gains additional dimensional information that enables both simplified determination logic and improved noise suppression through pattern recognition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary waveform combination before determination. It pre-combines intake pressure waveforms from multiple cylinders to create a composite waveform pattern, then uses this pre-processed pattern for stroke determination. This preliminary action simplifies the subsequent determination process while the aggregated waveform pattern inherently suppresses noise through averaging effects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If camshaft phase detection is implemented, then accurate stroke determination is achieved, but engine size and weight increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestroke determination accuracyVSAvoidengine weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSWeight of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes the camshaft phase detection requirement from the stroke determination system. By using only crankshaft position information combined with multi-cylinder intake pressure waveform analysis, it eliminates the need for camshaft sensors and associated hardware, thereby reducing engine weight and complexity while maintaining determination accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent makes the crankshaft position sensor and intake pressure sensors serve multiple functions. These components are used not only for their primary purposes but also for stroke determination, eliminating the need for dedicated camshaft phase detection hardware and reducing overall system weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS7194898B2Stroke determination unit and method of measuring stroke in a multi-cylinder four-cycle engine
Publication Date: 2007.03.27 HONDA MOTOR CO LTD
  • US7194898B2 patent drawing
  • US7194898B2 patent drawing
  • US7194898B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A stroke determination unit for a 4-cycle engine uses intake pressure as a parameter to provide accurate stroke determination. A combined pressure combines the detected pressures of intake ports of the first to third cylinders, and stroke determination is carried out by recognizing, within a combined pressure waveform based on a detection value for the combined pressure, shapes of the combined pressure waveform for a specified phase period of a crankshaft. The pressure pattern recognition is carried out by storing variation patterns of pressure values measured within the specified crankshaft phase period, and collating patterns with a data map stored within an ECU. Alternatively, the pattern recognition is carried out by collating with condition equations representing “rising” or “upward peak”. With the latter, pressure variation due to contamination such as electrical noise to the pressure sensor is made negligible, and noise suppression of the stroke determination unit is improved.