Strong Typing Module for RFID Event Verification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The complexity of configuring and managing RFID systems in distribution and manufacturing environments is overwhelming due to the numerous devices and components involved, leading to errors and inefficiencies in data verification and error-checking processes.

Innovation Solution

A strong typing module is introduced to facilitate the explicit specification of event types for RFID components, ensuring correct event handling and error detection within the processing pipeline, thereby optimizing data verification and reducing errors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If RFID systems are deployed with multiple devices and components for comprehensive monitoring, then measurement precision and data capture capability are improved, but device complexity and configuration difficulty increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata capture precisionVSAvoidsystem configuration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary layer (software framework, event processing system, or configuration management tool) that mediates between the complex RFID hardware components and the user/configuration process. This intermediary abstracts the complexity by providing standardized interfaces, automatic event routing, and centralized configuration management, allowing multiple RFID devices to be managed through a unified system rather than individual component configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If comprehensive event handling and error-checking processes are implemented in RFID systems, then reliability is improved, but processing time and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevent handling reliabilityVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary action by performing error-checking and validation rules upfront in the event processing pipeline. Configuration validation, data format verification, and event type matching are executed before main processing occurs, allowing early detection of errors and preventing downstream processing of invalid data. This reduces overall processing time by avoiding rework and exception handling later in the workflow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Manufacturing precision

If strong typing and explicit event type specification are enforced in RFID components, then manufacturing precision and error detection are improved, but ease of operation and implementation difficulty worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevent type matching precisionVSAvoidsystem implementation ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies self-service through automatic type inference and validation mechanisms. The system automatically infers event types from component configuration, data structures, and processing context, reducing the manual burden of explicit type specification. Type validation is performed automatically by the framework, providing compile-time or runtime checks without requiring extensive manual configuration or documentation from implementers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS7782203B2Strong typing of components in RFID business processes
Publication Date: 2010.08.24 MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC
  • US7782203B2 patent drawing
  • US7782203B2 patent drawing
  • US7782203B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The claimed subject matter provides a system and/or a method that facilitates verifying data within a radio frequency identification (RFID) business process. A radio frequency identification (RFID) business process can include at least one component that can receive an event from a logical source. A strong typing module can employ strong typing of the component to define at least one of an event type for the component, an input event type for the component, or an output event type for the component.