Single-Piece Structural Shelf for Rear Wheel Arch Belt Mounting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing seat belt retractor support systems for rear passengers in vehicles require complex assembly due to multiple parts and numerous welding points, leading to increased manufacturing complexity and potential rigidity issues, especially when dealing with rear wheel arches that are not in one piece.

Innovation Solution

A single-piece structural shelf is designed to connect the rear leg, rear wheel arch, and body side, providing a mechanical connection and serving as a support for the seat belt retractor, with a central zone and contour surfaces for secure attachment, including a fixing zone for the retractor and optional stiffening ribs, manufactured by stamping and assembled by welding.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If a multi-part support structure is used to connect the rear wheel arch, body side, and rear pillar, then the structural strength and stiffness are improved, but the assembly complexity and number of welding points increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidassembly complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple separate support parts into a single integrated shelf structure that simultaneously connects the rear wheel arch, body side, and rear pillar. This monolithic design eliminates the need for multiple separate components and their associated assembly operations, thereby reducing assembly complexity while maintaining structural strength through the unified geometry of the shelf.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple separate parts are assembled to form the support structure, then the manufacturing flexibility is improved, but the manufacturing precision and structural rigidity deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing flexibilityVSAvoidstructural rigidity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The shelf is designed with integrated segmentation features including openings in the lateral surfaces and rib structures that provide both manufacturing adaptability and structural rigidity. These segmented features allow for easy adaptation to different wheel arch configurations while the integrated monolithic construction ensures high manufacturing precision and structural rigidity without the complications of assembling multiple separate parts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If numerous welding points are used to attach the support structure to the vehicle body, then the reliability of the connection is improved, but the manufacturing time and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconnection reliabilityVSAvoidassembly productivity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

By merging multiple attachment functions into a single integrated shelf structure, the number of welding operations is significantly reduced. The unified geometry of the shelf allows for fewer, more strategic welding points compared to attaching multiple separate components, thereby improving assembly productivity while maintaining connection reliability through the robust monolithic construction and optimized attachment surfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Device complexity

If a single-piece shelf is used to connect the rear wheel arch and body side, then the assembly complexity is reduced, but the structural stiffness may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly simplicityVSAvoidstructural stiffness
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The shelf incorporates local quality enhancements through strategically placed rib structures and optimized thickness variations in different regions. These local reinforcements provide the necessary structural stiffness in critical areas while maintaining the overall simplicity of the single-piece design, thus resolving the contradiction between assembly simplicity and structural stiffness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

5Adaptability or versatility

If the wheel arch is assembled from three separate parts, then the manufacturing flexibility is improved, but the structural integrity and stiffness of the overall assembly deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing flexibilityVSAvoidstructural integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The integrated shelf structure merges the connection functions for all three wheel arch parts into a single unified attachment system. This allows the shelf to maintain structural integrity and stiffness by providing a continuous load path across the wheel arch assembly, while still accommodating the manufacturing flexibility of using three separate wheel arch components through its adaptable geometry and attachment features.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentEP4077104B1Structural shelf for a motor vehicle
Publication Date: 2024.02.14 RENAULT SA
  • EP4077104B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4077104B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

The invention relates to a shelf (30) for a motor vehicle, intended for being secured between a rear pillar (20), an upper surface (31) of a rear wheel arch (13) and a side of the bodywork (15) of the motor vehicle, characterised in that the shelf (30) comprises a single part comprising: a. a central zone (32) extending substantially along a central plane (33), the central zone (32) being delimited by an edge (34); b. a contour (35) extending at any point of the edge (34) in a secant direction (36, 37, 38, 39), preferably perpendicular, to the central plane (33).