Structured Adhesive Surface for Shear-Release Detachment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing technical structures face difficulties in achieving simple and selective detachment, particularly for normal adhesion, due to the need for high aspect ratio structures and compressive loading, which are challenging to produce and may destabilize sensitive objects.

Innovation Solution

A molded body with a structured surface featuring projections that can be easily detached by shear loading, reducing adhesion force through deformation, allowing for selective detachment without perpendicular pressure, using projections with an aspect ratio below 10 and a modulus of elasticity gradient, enabling easy bending and detachment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If projections with high aspect ratio (>3) are used for detachment by Euler buckling, then detachment from substrate is possible, but the structures are difficult to produce and tend toward instability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetachment capabilityVSAvoidproduction difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the aspect ratio parameter from high (>3) to low (below 10, preferably below 5), fundamentally altering the detachment mechanism from Euler buckling to shear-induced bending. This parameter change makes the structures easier to produce and more stable while maintaining detachment capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of using compressive loading (Euler buckling) for detachment, the patent inverts the approach by using shear loading to induce bending and reduction in contact area. This inversion of the detachment mechanism resolves the manufacturing and stability issues

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Reliability

If compressive loading is applied in the direction of the object for detachment, then contact area reduction is achieved, but additional pressure perpendicular to the adhesive surface is required which is disadvantageous for sensitive objects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetachment capabilityVSAvoidperpendicular pressure on sensitive objects
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent inverts the loading direction from compressive (perpendicular) to shear (parallel), applying force in the direction of the surface rather than perpendicular to it. This eliminates the harmful perpendicular pressure on sensitive objects while maintaining effective detachment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the loading mode parameter from compressive to shear, fundamentally altering how detachment is achieved. This parameter change eliminates the need for perpendicular pressure while maintaining detachment effectiveness through shear-induced bending

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Force

If projections with large height and small diameter are used, then easier buckling under smaller forces is achieved, but the structures have high aspect ratio and are difficult to produce

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebuckling forceVSAvoidproduction difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the height-to-diameter ratio parameter, using projections with aspect ratio below 10 (preferably below 5) instead of high aspect ratio structures. This maintains adequate detachment force while significantly improving manufacturability and stability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of optimizing for easy buckling through high aspect ratio, the patent inverts the approach by using lower aspect ratio projections that detach through shear-induced bending. This inversion achieves force reduction through a different mechanism that is also easier to manufacture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables easy and selective detachment of the molded body from surfaces by lateral displacement or rotation, reducing the contact area and adhesive force, suitable for sensitive objects and microcomponents, without requiring high loading or compressive forces.

Implementation Method 1

If a structured elastomer surface is pressed with a certain pressing-on force against a comparatively flat surface, van der Waals interactions can take place.

Methodology Applied
Scientific Effectvan der Waals interactions: Van der Waals Force

Implementation Method 2

The projections are deformed in a manner dependent on their flexural rigidity (E*I). As a result, the adhesion force is likewise reduced and the structure is detached.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS11873849B2Shaped body having a structured surface for reversible adhesion
Publication Date: 2024.01.16 INNOCISE GMBH
  • US11873849B2 patent drawing
  • US11873849B2 patent drawing
  • US11873849B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A molded body with a structured surface for reversible adhesion to surfaces includes projections having an aspect ratio of up to 10. The structure can be easily detached from the surface by a lateral movement.