Structured Packing Element with Optimized Grid Geometry

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Structured packing elements in mass transfer columns face challenges in achieving high mass transfer efficiency and capacity while minimizing material costs and investment, as they often require expensive materials and have limited capacity due to high flow resistance and flooding issues.

Innovation Solution

A structured packing element design featuring at least two layers with a grid of openings and separating elements, where the average width of the separating elements is significantly larger than the layer material thickness and hydraulic diameter, allowing for improved mass transfer efficiency and capacity without using expensive materials, by optimizing the geometry and production process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If traditional corrugated sheets with small openings are used, then material cost is reduced, but wettability deteriorates and mass transfer efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial costVSAvoidwettability
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the geometric parameters of the grid structure, specifically setting the separating element width to 70-125% of the hydraulic diameter and at least 15 times the layer material thickness. This parameter optimization ensures adequate liquid distribution and wetting while using less material compared to traditional fine-perforated sheets.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses a grid structure with openings that creates a porous-like flow path system. The grid of openings allows liquid to distribute through the packing layer while the separating elements provide structural support and guide flow, achieving good wettability without requiring dense perforations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

2Reliability

If separating element width is increased, then mass transfer efficiency improves, but material usage increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemass transfer efficiencyVSAvoidmaterial usage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The invention optimizes the separating element width parameter to a specific range (70-125% of hydraulic diameter, and at least 15 times the layer material thickness). This optimized parameter range achieves the dual benefit of ensuring adequate liquid distribution for mass transfer while minimizing material consumption compared to traditional designs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Quantity of substance

If layer material thickness is reduced, then material cost decreases, but structural strength and flow distribution deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial costVSAvoidstructural strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The invention establishes a critical relationship parameter: separating element width must be at least 15 times the layer material thickness. This ratio ensures that even with thin materials, the separating elements maintain sufficient structural strength and flow distribution capability, enabling cost reduction through thinner materials without sacrificing performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Quantity of substance

If grid structure with openings is used instead of solid sheets, then material usage decreases, but flow resistance increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial usageVSAvoidflow resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The grid structure with openings creates a controlled porous flow path system. The openings allow light phase to ascend while the separating elements guide heavy phase flow, reducing flow resistance compared to solid sheets while maintaining adequate material usage for structural integrity and flow distribution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enhances mass transfer efficiency and capacity while reducing material costs, as the larger separating element width and optimized geometry improve wetting and flow distribution, leading to better performance and reduced pressure drop, even with less physical area and material usage.

Implementation Method 1

The average width of at least 50% of the separating elements between adjacent openings is at least 15 times the layer material thickness

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapillary action: Capillary Action

Implementation Method 2

improve wetting and flow distribution

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSurface tension: Surface Tension

Implementation Method 3

structured packing elements are typically operated in counter-current flow. While in distillation and absorption applications, the light phase is a gas or vapor and the heavy phase is a condensate or liquid

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCounter-current flow: Convection

Implementation Method 4

adjacent corrugated sheets are oriented such that the corrugations of the adjacent corrugated sheets intersect in crisscross fashion with the corrugations of the corrugated sheets extending obliquely relative to the vertical or longitudinal direction, thus forming inclined channels which continuously cross one another

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlow direction control: Convection

Data Source

PatentUS12115513B2Structured packing element with reduced material requirement
Publication Date: 2024.10.15 SULZER MANAGEMENT AG
  • US12115513B2 patent drawing
  • US12115513B2 patent drawing
  • US12115513B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A structured packing element for a column for at least one of mass transfer and heat exchange between a heavy fluid phase and a light fluid phase. The structured packing element comprises at least two layers of a grid comprising openings that are surrounded and separated from each other by separating elements. At least two of the layers are arranged in a longitudinal direction parallel and in touching contact with each other such that an open space extending from one end to an opposite end of the layers is provided between the layers such that at least one of the heavy fluid phase and the light fluid phase may flow therethrough. An average width of at least 50% of the separating elements between adjacent openings is at least 15 times a layer material thickness and is between 70% and 125% of an average hydraulic diameter of the adjacent openings.