Structured Packing in Tubular Reactor Cooling Zones

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Tube bundle reactors face significant downtimes and catalyst material loss due to the need for frequent replacement of the solid bed in the cooling zone, which leads to high maintenance costs and operational interruptions, especially in large reactors where the inert and catalyst materials mix during drainage and refilling.

Innovation Solution

The use of structured packing in the cooling zone allows for the replacement of inert material from below, keeping the catalyst material in place, with a gas-permeable support at the lower end and a closure at the upper opening, enabling easier maintenance and minimizing catalyst loss.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If loose inert material is used in the cooling zone, then the bed can be easily filled from above, but the material must be completely drained and refilled during maintenance causing catalyst loss and long downtimes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of fillingVSAvoiddowntime
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The packing material is segmented into modular structured units that can be independently removed and replaced. This allows the cooling zone packing to be cleaned or replaced without affecting the catalyst bed in the reaction zone, eliminating the need to drain and refill entire tube contents during maintenance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of filling from above as with loose material, the structured packing is inserted from below the reaction zone. This inversion of the filling direction allows the packing to be pushed into place without disturbing the catalyst bed, and enables removal from the same direction during maintenance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Ease of manufacture

If loose inert material is used in the cooling zone, then filling from above is simple, but catalyst and inert material mix during drainage causing economic loss

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of fillingVSAvoidcatalyst loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The structured packing creates a segmented, organized structure that physically separates the cooling zone from the reaction zone. This segmentation prevents mixing between inert packing material and catalyst during maintenance operations, as each zone can be accessed and serviced independently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

By inverting the filling approach to insert structured packing from below rather than pouring loose material from above, the system eliminates the mixing problem entirely. The structured units are pushed into place in an organized manner that maintains zone separation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Loss of time

If structured packing is used in the cooling zone, then replacement can be done from below keeping catalyst in place, but the packing must be inserted from the narrow gas collection space

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovedowntimeVSAvoidease of installation
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The structured packing is divided into smaller modular segments that can be individually maneuvered through the narrow gas collection space at the bottom of the reactor. These segmented units are then assembled or stacked within the cooling zone, making installation feasible despite spatial constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution significantly reduces operational interruptions and maintenance costs by allowing for efficient cleaning of the cooling zone with minimal catalyst loss, enabling targeted reaction control and reduced downtime.

Implementation Method 1

a tubular reactor (1) for carrying out a heterogeneously catalyzed chemical reaction in the gas phase

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeterogeneous catalysis: Catalysis

Implementation Method 2

liquid heat transfer medium circulating in the reactor jacket

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat transfer: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 3

liquid heat transfer medium circulating in the reactor jacket

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConvection: Convection

Implementation Method 4

The inert bed of solids has the task of improving the heat transfer between the gas and the tube wall

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat transfer enhancement: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 5

The catalyst bed and structured packing are held in place by a gas permeable removable support installed at their lower end

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhysical support:

Data Source

PatentEP2678100B1Multi-tube reactor having a structured packing and a holder
Publication Date: 2014.07.16 AIR LIQUIDE GLOBAL E&C SOLUTIONS GERMANY GMBH
  • EP2678100B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2678100B1 patent drawingFigure 2

AI summary

The invention relates to a tubular reactor for carrying out a catalytically supported, homogeneous chemical reaction in the gas phase at an elevated temperature and a subsequent cooling, wherein the reactor is arranged upright, and therefore the tubes extend vertically and the gas flows downward through the tubes, wherein the tubes are filled with a catalyst bed in the upper part thereof extending in the reaction zone of the reactor and are filled with a structured packing in the lower part, the cooling zone of the reactor.