Strut-Braced Wing Structural Arrangement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Strut-braced wings face structural inefficiencies due to large vertical moments induced by tension loads in struts, which are not effectively managed, leading to axial loads that conventional wing spars are not designed to handle, especially in high-aspect-ratio, swept-wing aircraft.

Innovation Solution

The aircraft design features a center wing structure coupled to the fuselage with outer wing structures supported by struts, where each strut is attached below and aft of the wing-fuselage joint, and the outer wing structures are connected to the center wing at mid-wing joints located between engine mounting locations and strut-wing joints, reducing axial loads and distributing spanwise bending moments efficiently.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If the strut-fuselage joint is located aft of the wing-fuselage joint to reduce interference drag, then aerodynamic performance is improved, but large vertical moments and axial loads are induced on the wings and struts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterference dragVSAvoidvertical moment
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The wing structure is segmented into a center wing structure and outer wing structures that can be independently connected. The outer wing structures are connected to the center wing structure at mid-wing joints located between the engine mounting locations and strut-wing joints, allowing the structure to segment and distribute the large vertical moments and axial loads rather than concentrating them at the wing root.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The center wing structure acts as an intermediary element between the outer wing structures and the fuselage. It receives the vertical moments and axial loads from the outer wing structures and transfers them to the fuselage at the wing-fuselage joint, which is positioned ahead of the strut-fuselage joint, thereby reducing the moment arm and the induced vertical moments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If high-aspect-ratio wings are used to increase aerodynamic performance, then aspect ratio is improved, but the vertical thickness of the airfoil section at the wing root becomes shallower, reducing structural capacity to accommodate axial loads

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaerodynamic performanceVSAvoidstructural capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The wing is divided into multiple structural segments (center wing structure and outer wing structures) connected at mid-wing joints. This segmentation allows the shallower airfoil section at the wing root to avoid carrying the full axial load by distributing it through the outer wing structures and mid-wing joints, thereby maintaining structural capacity without increasing root thickness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The structural solution moves from a two-dimensional wing root thickening approach to a three-dimensional distribution system. By introducing mid-wing joints and outer wing structures, the load path is extended in the spanwise dimension, allowing axial loads to be distributed along the wing span rather than concentrated at the root, thereby accommodating loads without increasing root thickness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Device complexity

If conventional cantilevered wing configuration is used, then structural simplicity is maintained, but spanwise bending moments are not effectively reduced compared to strut-braced configurations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural simplicityVSAvoidspanwise bending moment
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The wing structure is segmented into a center wing structure and outer wing structures connected at mid-wing joints. This segmentation allows the outer wing structures to be supported by struts, effectively reducing spanwise bending moments in the outer portions of the wing while maintaining overall structural integrity and simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS12091155B2Structural arrangement for strut-braced wing assembly of an aircraft
Publication Date: 2024.09.17 THE BOEING CO
  • US12091155B2 patent drawing
  • US12091155B2 patent drawing
  • US12091155B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An aircraft has a fuselage, a wing assembly, and a pair of struts. The wing assembly has a center wing structure and a pair of outer wing structures. The center wing structure is coupled to the fuselage at a wing-fuselage joint, and has a pair of engine mounting locations respectively on opposite sides of a wing centerline. Each of the struts is coupled to the fuselage at a strut-fuselage joint, and to one of the outer wing structures at a strut-wing joint. Each strut-fuselage joint is located below and aft of the wing-fuselage joint. Each outer wing structure is coupled to the center wing structure at a mid-wing joint located no further inboard than the engine mounting location, and no further outboard than the strut-wing joint.