Static Transfer Switch Priority Logic for Catcher UPS Overload Prevention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Catcher UPS systems face the risk of overload when multiple static transfer switches (STSs) transfer loads to a single catcher UPS, leading to potential power failures, which current manual lockout approaches struggle to manage effectively across different failure modes.

Innovation Solution

Each STS is connected via a communications link to broadcast real-time power data, allowing it to evaluate characteristics and determine priority for load transfer to the catcher UPS, preventing overload by ensuring only the highest priority STS transfers loads when the catcher UPS's available power is sufficient, using control logic and communication circuitry to manage instantaneous switching.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If multiple STSs transfer loads to a single catcher UPS, then the catcher UPS can handle more load scenarios, but the catcher UPS may become overloaded

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload handling capabilityVSAvoidoverload risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit receives real-time power data from the catcher UPS via the communications link, continuously monitoring available power capacity. This feedback mechanism enables dynamic decision-making about load transfer, allowing the STS to adjust its behavior based on current system conditions and prevent overload while maximizing load handling capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements dynamic priority assignment and real-time evaluation of power characteristics. The control unit can change the operational state of the STS based on real-time conditions, such as whether to allow load transfer or lock out the STS, making the system adaptable to varying load scenarios without fixed static configurations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If manual lockout approaches are used to prevent STS overload, then overload protection is provided, but the system becomes difficult to sustain across different failure modes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoverload protectionVSAvoidconfiguration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit automatically evaluates power characteristics, determines priority, and makes lockout or transfer decisions without requiring manual intervention. The system self-manages overload protection by continuously monitoring real-time power data and autonomously adjusting STS operational states, eliminating the need for installers to manually configure different failure modes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The automated control system handles multiple failure modes and operational scenarios through a single unified approach. The control unit can manage various UPS failure conditions, load priorities, and power characteristics using the same real-time evaluation logic, making the system easy to operate across diverse failure scenarios without requiring mode-specific configurations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Extent of automation

If real-time power data broadcasting is implemented, then automated priority-based load transfer is enabled, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomated load transferVSAvoidcommunication infrastructure
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The communications link serves as an intermediary that enables automated control without requiring complex point-to-point connections between all components. The link allows the catcher UPS and STS to exchange real-time power data efficiently, facilitating automated priority-based load transfer through a standardized communication interface that simplifies the overall system architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentEP3918688B1Technologies for static transfer switch load transfer for catcher uninterruptible power supply systems
Publication Date: 2024.06.05 ABB (SCHWEIZ) AG
  • EP3918688B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3918688B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3918688B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Technologies for transferring a load by a static transfer switch (STS) to a catcher uninterruptible power supply (UPS) are disclosed. In an illustrative embodiment, each STS in a catcher UPS system monitors an available power of the catcher UPS. The STS determines, in response to a power failure event of an associated UPS, whether a real-time power supplied to a load connected to the STS exceeds the available power of the catcher UPS and whether the STS has priority over each other STS in the system. The STS transfers the load from the associated UPS to the catcher UPS in response to determining that the real-time power supplied to the load does not exceed the available power of the catcher UPS and that the STS has priority over each other STS in the system.