Socio-technical System Service Design Automation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current socio-technical system (STS) service design methods face challenges in scalability, dimensionality reduction, and time/resource constraints due to human-based approaches, which are inadequate for large-scale software-intensive systems and often result in misunderstandings and inefficiencies in the design thinking process across cross-functional teams (CFTs) due to different interpretations and geographical barriers.

Innovation Solution

A system and method utilizing machine learning and natural language processing (NLP) to assemble and coordinate cross-functional teams, perform thematic analysis, weighted voting, principal component analysis, and multivariate regression to optimize STS service design, automating the dimensionality reduction and convergence processes, and generating a service design blueprint using a pattern language graph.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If human-based design methods are used for STS service design, then design thinking and creativity are improved, but time consumption and resource requirements increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign thinking capabilityVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an automated processing system as an intermediary between design inputs and outputs. This system uses natural language processing to capture design thinking from cross-functional teams, automatically performs thematic analysis and dimensionality reduction, and generates design blueprints. This intermediary automates the time-consuming manual processes while preserving the creative design thinking capability of human teams.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical processes (human analysts physically performing thematic analysis, dimensionality reduction, and blueprint generation) with automated computational mechanisms. Machine learning algorithms automatically process design inputs, perform principal component analysis, and generate outputs, substituting the mechanical human effort with efficient computational processes that maintain design quality while reducing time consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Manufacturing precision

If cross-functional teams are assembled for STS service design, then design quality and perspective are improved, but coordination difficulties and communication barriers increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign qualityVSAvoidteam coordination complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The automated processing system serves as a neutral intermediary that receives inputs from all cross-functional team members through a standardized interface. This intermediary automatically processes and integrates diverse perspectives without the coordination difficulties that arise from direct human-to-human communication across different time zones and organizational boundaries, while preserving the quality contributions of each team member.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a standardized input interface and processing framework that homogenizes the diverse inputs from cross-functional team members. By providing a common structure for capturing design thinking and a unified processing mechanism, the system eliminates the heterogeneity and communication barriers that typically plague cross-functional teams, allowing diverse expertise to be integrated efficiently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #33Homogeneity

3Measurement precision

If manual thematic analysis and dimensionality reduction are performed, then design insights are improved, but processing speed and scalability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign insight accuracyVSAvoidprocessing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual thematic analysis and dimensionality reduction with automated machine learning algorithms. These computational mechanisms use natural language processing to automatically identify themes, patterns, and dimensions in design inputs, and apply principal component analysis for dimensionality reduction. This substitution maintains the analytical precision of manual processes while achieving orders of magnitude improvement in processing speed and scalability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the parameters of the analysis process from manual operations to automated computational operations. By changing the mode of execution from human cognitive processing to machine learning algorithms, the system maintains the depth and accuracy of thematic analysis and dimensionality reduction while dramatically improving processing speed, enabling the handling of large-scale software-intensive systems that would be intractable for manual analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Productivity

If automated processing is used for STS service design, then processing speed and scalability are improved, but design thinking quality and human judgment may deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoiddesign thinking quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The automated processing system acts as an intermediary that enhances rather than replaces human design thinking. It captures and structures inputs from cross-functional teams, performs automated analysis, and generates design blueprints that are then reviewed and refined by human experts. This intermediary role allows automated speed and scalability while preserving human judgment and design quality through collaborative refinement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback loops where automated processing outputs are reviewed and validated by cross-functional teams and expert reviewers. This feedback mechanism ensures that automated processing maintains design thinking quality by allowing human experts to identify and correct any deficiencies, while the automated system provides the speed and scalability benefits. The iterative feedback process bridges the gap between automated efficiency and human judgment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20230359996A1Semi-automatic system and method for socio-technical system service design at scale
Publication Date: 2023.11.09 TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LTD
  • US20230359996A1 patent drawing
  • US20230359996A1 patent drawing
  • US20230359996A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Socio-technical system (STS) service design is an approach to design that consider human, social and organizational factors, as well as technical factors. Due to the nature of STS, any human effort will have challenges in terms of time and resource constraints in such a scenario. A method and system for designing the STS service at scale has been provided. The present disclosure is configured to bring efficiency in terms of time taken and efficacy in terms of dimensions covered. The system uses machine learning methods and natural language processing to aid the rapid process transformation of design thinking for STS. The system is using machine intervention for dimensionality reduction, helps in giving a weighted approach towards goal achievement irrespective of human biases. The prototype is expressed in a commonly understandable human language helping in prototype evaluation—visualizing the prototype even before it is built.