STT-RAM MTJ Etching with Encapsulation and Clean-up

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Spin-transfer torque (STT) random access memory (RAM) faces challenges in patterning the magnetic stack due to etch-induced damage and redeposition of conductive materials, which degrades performance, especially as dimensions scale below 40 nm, requiring a non-damaging etch process for dense arrays with near vertical sidewalls for electrical isolation.

Innovation Solution

A method involving near normal incidence etching of the magnetic tunnel junction (MTJ) stack, followed by clean-up etches at larger angles to remove redeposited materials, encapsulation layer deposition to preserve the sidewall profile, and subsequent etching while maintaining the encapsulation layer, along with optional use of diamond-like carbon (DLC) hard masks and directional deposition to achieve vertical sidewalls and prevent corrosion.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional etching is used to pattern the magnetic stack, then the structure can be formed, but etch-induced damage degrades the performance of the magnetic tunnel junction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice performanceVSAvoidetch-induced damage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the etching parameters by using low energy ion beam etching (100-500 eV) instead of conventional high energy plasma etching. This parameter change reduces ion-induced damage to the magnetic tunnel junction while still achieving adequate etching rates and profile control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces conventional plasma-based chemical etching with ion beam physical vapor deposition (IB-PVD) etching. This substitution uses physically sputtered ions at low energies to remove material, minimizing chemical reactions and associated damage to the sensitive MTJ stack

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Manufacturing precision

If etching is performed to remove material, then the structure is patterned, but redeposited conductive material condenses on sidewalls and creates electrical shorts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepattern fidelityVSAvoidredeposited conductive material
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a temporal dimension to the etching process by performing it in multiple sequential steps with different parameters. The first etch step patterns the structure, while subsequent clean-up etch steps remove redeposited material, effectively adding a time-based separation between pattern formation and contamination removal

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary protective actions by depositing encapsulation layers (such as aluminum oxide or silicon nitride) on the sidewalls before the main etching process. These pre-applied protective layers prevent conductive material from condensing on the sidewalls during etching, thereby preventing electrical shorts between adjacent structures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If dimension scaling is performed below 40 nm, then device density increases, but etch-induced damage and redeposition effects become more severe

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice densityVSAvoidetch damage and redeposition
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the energy parameter of the ion beam to very low levels (100-500 eV), which reduces the penetration depth and damage zone in scaled structures. This low energy parameter allows adequate etching of sub-40 nm features while minimizing damage accumulation that would be more severe at smaller dimensions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the etching process into multiple distinct steps: a main patterning etch step followed by separate clean-up etch steps. This segmentation allows each step to be optimized for its specific purpose, with the main step creating the pattern and subsequent steps removing redeposited material, thereby addressing the exacerbated contamination problems in scaled devices

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Reliability

If aggressive etching is used to achieve vertical sidewalls, then electrical isolation between adjacent bits is improved, but damage to the magnetic tunnel junction increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrical isolationVSAvoidMTJ integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary protective encapsulation layers on the sidewalls before etching. These pre-deposited layers (aluminum oxide, silicon nitride, or diamond-like carbon) act as protective barriers during the etching process, enabling the use of etching parameters that produce vertical sidewalls for electrical isolation while the protective layer absorbs the ion bombardment damage that would otherwise harm the MTJ

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces aggressive plasma chemistry with low energy physical sputtering. This substitution achieves sidewall verticality through controlled physical removal of material at low ion energies, avoiding the chemical reactions and high energy bombardment that cause MTJ damage in conventional aggressive etching processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach minimizes etch-induced damage, maintains near vertical sidewalls, and prevents electrical shorts, enabling scaling down to sub-20 nm dimensions while ensuring the integrity and performance of STT-RAM structures.

Implementation Method 1

Ion beam etching of the stack just past the magnetic tunnel junction (MTJ) with the etching performed at a near normal incidence angle

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectIon beam sputtering: Sputtering

Implementation Method 2

depositing an encapsulation layer over the cleaned up etched sidewalls

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhysical vapor deposition: Physical Vapour Deposition

Data Source

PatentUS9978934B2Ion beam etching of STT-RAM structures
Publication Date: 2018.05.22 VEECO INSTRUMENTS INC
  • US9978934B2 patent drawing
  • US9978934B2 patent drawing
  • US9978934B2 patent drawing

AI summary

This disclosure provides various methods for improved etching of spin-transfer torque random access memory (STT-RAM) structures. In one example, the method includes (1) ion beam etch of the stack just past the MTJ at near normal incidence, (2) a short clean-up etch at a larger angle in a windowed mode to remove any redeposited material along the sidewall that extends from just below the MTJ to just above the MTJ, (3) deposition of an encapsulant with controlled step coverage to revert to a vertical or slightly re-entrant profile from the tapered profile generated by the etch steps, (4) ion beam etch of the remainder of the stack at near normal incidence while preserving the encapsulation along the sidewall of the MTJ, (5) clean-up etch at a larger angle and windowed mode to remove redeposited materials from the sidewalls, and (6) encapsulation of the etched stack.