Student Competency Assessment via Time-Normalized Discussion Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current educational assessment systems are inadequate in evaluating student competency beyond didactic environments, particularly in clinical and interdisciplinary settings, as they fail to effectively assess skills and problem-solving abilities in a longitudinal manner.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for assessing student competency through online discussion events by analyzing discussion posts, assigning relative value units (RVUs) based on complexity and time-normalization, and integrating microcompetency codes to evaluate student performance across different educational environments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional didactic-based testing systems are used to evaluate students, then the assessment process is simple and automated, but the system cannot effectively evaluate student competency in clinical and interdisciplinary settings beyond didactic environments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassessment capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system integrates multiple assessment modalities (didactic tests, clinical evaluations, discussion forum analysis) into a single comprehensive competency assessment platform. The microcompetency code framework allows the same system to evaluate diverse educational outcomes across different environments, making the assessment system universally applicable to various educational settings while maintaining manageable complexity through standardized coding structures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive competency assessment including clinical environments is implemented, then student competency evaluation becomes more accurate and complete, but the assessment system becomes more complex and difficult to automate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompetency measurement accuracyVSAvoidassessment system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments competency assessment into discrete microcompetency codes that can be independently evaluated and aggregated. By breaking down complex clinical and interdisciplinary competencies into smaller, codable units, the system achieves precise measurement of student competency while maintaining automation capability through standardized coding and evaluation protocols for each microcompetency element

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms qualitative assessment data from diverse sources (clinical observations, discussion forum posts, didactic test results) into quantitative microcompetency scores through parameter changes. This transformation enables precise competency measurement across different assessment modalities while maintaining system automation through consistent scoring algorithms that convert various input types into comparable numerical outputs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If manual evaluation of discussion forum posts is performed to assess student competency, then the assessment captures nuanced student skills and problem-solving abilities, but the process becomes time-consuming and less productive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveskill assessment accuracyVSAvoidassessment throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements automated analysis of discussion forum posts using natural language processing and text analytics to evaluate student competency. The assessment system serves itself by automatically coding and scoring discussion contributions based on predefined microcompetency criteria, eliminating the need for manual evaluation while maintaining precise measurement of student skills and problem-solving abilities through algorithmic analysis of post content, frequency, and quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS11170658B2Methods, systems, and computer program products for normalization and cumulative analysis of cognitive post content
Publication Date: 2021.11.09 EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY
  • US11170658B2 patent drawing
  • US11170658B2 patent drawing
  • US11170658B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and computer program products for assessing a student in in an online discussion event using at least one processor of a computer includes obtaining discussion data comprising a plurality of discussion posts in a data file, each comprising a post author and post content, grouping the plurality of discussion posts of the data file into a plurality of discussion threads, classifying individual discussion posts of the plurality of discussion posts based on a post type, and assigning relative value units (RVUs) to at least one of the plurality of discussion posts, where the RVUs are time-normalized scores based on a complexity of the discussion post.