Multi-Modal Student Engagement Detection via Video and Logs

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current uni-modal intelligent systems for monitoring student engagement in learning tasks rely solely on data from student interactions and event logs, lacking the comprehensive understanding provided by human tutors who use multi-modal approaches, including body language and contextual cues.

Innovation Solution

A multi-modal approach that combines student appearance data from video captured by device cameras with contextual and performance data from educational platforms to detect behavioral and emotional engagement states in real-time, using machine learning classifiers to infer engagement levels and present them on a teacher dashboard for personalized interventions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a uni-modal intelligent system uses only student interaction and event log data to monitor engagement, then the system complexity is reduced and ease of operation is improved, but the measurement precision and reliability of engagement detection deteriorates compared to human tutor judgment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidmeasurement precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple data modalities including student interaction logs, event logs, video appearance data, and contextual cues into a unified multi-modal intelligent system. This combination allows the system to achieve human tutor-level measurement precision in detecting student engagement states while maintaining automated operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses composite data structures that integrate heterogeneous data types (structured logs, unstructured video data, contextual information) similar to how composite materials combine different substances. This enables the system to leverage the strengths of each data modality to achieve high measurement precision in engagement detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Device complexity

If a uni-modal intelligent system relies solely on interaction and event log data, then the device complexity is reduced, but the reliability of understanding student engagement states deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice complexityVSAvoidreliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple independent data sources and analysis modalities into a unified system that cross-validates engagement assessments. By merging interaction data, event logs, appearance analysis, and contextual cues, the system achieves high reliability in determining student engagement states while managing complexity through integrated architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where multiple data modalities continuously inform and validate each other in determining engagement states. This cross-modal feedback loop enhances reliability by ensuring that engagement assessments are consistent across different data sources and aligned with actual student states.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11908345B2Engagement level determination and dissemination
Publication Date: 2024.02.20 INTEL CORP
  • US11908345B2 patent drawing
  • US11908345B2 patent drawing
  • US11908345B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Various systems and methods for engagement dissemination. A face detector detects a face in video data. A context filterer determines a student is on-platform and a section type. An appearance monitor selects an emotional and a behavioral classifiers. Emotional and behavioral components are classified based on the detected face. A context-performance monitor selects an emotional and a behavioral classifiers specific to the section type, Emotional and behavioral components are classified based on the log data. A fuser combines the emotional components into an emotional state of the student based on confidence values of the emotional components. The fuser combines the behavioral components a behavioral state of the student based on confidence values of the behavioral components. The user determine an engagement level of the student based on the emotional state and the behavioral state of the student.