Stuffer Unit Tine Arm Tripping for Baler Density Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Agricultural balers face challenges in achieving higher density of crop material in the pre-compression chamber during the stuffing cycle, which affects bale quality and requires complex control systems and peak load management.

Innovation Solution

A stuffer unit with a tine arm that can be fixed during loading and tripped to a different orientation using a spring-loaded arrangement, allowing for continuous cyclic movement and adjustable density control without the need for a stuffer brake or complex steering units.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a fixed tine arm is used during loading, then the loading process is simple and reliable, but the density control during stuffing is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveloading reliabilityVSAvoiddensity control
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The tine arm is designed to be dynamic rather than fixed, allowing it to change orientation between loading and stuffing modes. During loading, the tine arm remains fixed for simplicity and reliability. During stuffing, the spring-loaded mechanism allows the tine arm to trip to a different orientation to achieve better density control. This dynamic adaptability resolves the contradiction between loading reliability and density control precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the operational parameters of the tine arm based on the cycle phase. In loading mode, the tine arm maintains a fixed parameter state for reliability. In stuffing mode, the spring mechanism enables the parameter (tine arm orientation) to change, allowing optimization of density control without compromising loading reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Power

If a spring-loaded tripping mechanism is used, then peak load is reduced and continuous operation is enabled, but the mechanism complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepeak load reductionVSAvoidmechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The spring-loaded mechanism is designed to trip periodically during the stuffing cycle rather than continuously. The spring accumulates energy during the loading phase and releases it periodically during the stuffing phase to trip the tine arm. This periodic action reduces peak load requirements while avoiding the need for complex continuous control systems, thus resolving the contradiction between power efficiency and mechanism complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The spring-loaded mechanism is self-actuating and does not require external power or complex control systems. The spring automatically trips the tine arm during the stuffing cycle based on predetermined mechanical conditions, eliminating the need for motors, sensors, or control electronics. This self-service approach reduces peak load while keeping the mechanism relatively simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If the stuffer operates in continuous cyclic movement, then productivity increases, but control system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontinuous operationVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The stuffer is designed to operate in continuous cyclic movement without stopping between loading and stuffing phases. The tine arm and spring mechanism are synchronized with the plunger cycle, allowing seamless transition between loading and stuffing operations. This continuous operation increases productivity while the mechanical synchronization eliminates the need for complex control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The spring-loaded mechanism acts as an intermediary between the loading and stuffing phases, enabling smooth transition without stopping. The spring stores energy during loading and releases it during stuffing, mediating the continuous cyclic operation. This mechanical intermediary enables continuous productivity while avoiding complex electronic control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution enables the formation of bales with improved density and shape, reduced peak load during operation, and eliminates the need for a stuffer brake or complex control systems, allowing for continuous operation and adjustable density settings.

Implementation Method 1

tines (28) are allowed to trip with a spring loaded arrangement to a loading orientation during a loading cycle

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring: Spring

Data Source

PatentEP2962544B1Stuffer unit for an agricultural baler with automatic density control
Publication Date: 2021.08.11 CNH IND BELGIUM NV
  • EP2962544B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2962544B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2962544B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

An agricultural baler (10) includes a main bale chamber (26), a plunger (30) reciprocally movable within the main bale chamber (26), and a stuffer unit (24) including a tine arm (50) defining an axis of rotation (52) and a plurality of tines (28) coupled with and extending from the tine arm (50). The baler (10) is characterized in that the tines (28) are rotatable around the axis of rotation (52) of the tine arm (50) between a first position associated with a stuffing cycle and a second position associated with a loading cycle.