Sub-block Data Deduplication via Shared Mapping

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current data deduplication techniques fail to detect redundant data when blocks are similar but not identical, missing opportunities for deduplication by only considering full block matches, and not accounting for partial similarities between candidate and target blocks.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a shared sub-block mapping (SSM) structure that compares sub-blocks of candidate and target blocks using digests and entropy values to identify matching sub-blocks, allowing for partial deduplication and storing metadata to indicate shared sub-blocks, thereby enabling flexible partial block deduplication.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of substance

If full block deduplication is used, then storage efficiency is improved for identical blocks, but redundant data detection fails for similar but not identical blocks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestorage efficiencyVSAvoidredundant data detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides data blocks into smaller sub-blocks (e.g., 512-byte sectors) and performs deduplication at the sub-block level rather than requiring full block matches. This segmentation allows the system to identify and deduplicate similar data even when blocks differ slightly, resolving the contradiction between storage efficiency and detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the granularity parameter from full block level to sub-block level, and introduces a similarity threshold parameter (e.g., 70% or 80% match) to determine deduplication eligibility. This allows flexible control over deduplication behavior, improving both storage efficiency and detection reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If sub-block level comparison is implemented, then detection accuracy for similar blocks is improved, but processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveredundant data detection accuracyVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary actions by first computing digests for all sub-blocks of candidate and target blocks before performing actual comparisons. This preliminary digest computation and indexing allows for rapid similarity assessment, reducing the complexity of subsequent detailed sub-block comparisons.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary data structure (SSM - Shared Sub-block Mapping) that mediates between candidate blocks and target blocks. This SSM structure stores mapping relationships between matching sub-blocks, simplifying the comparison process and reducing processing complexity while maintaining high detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Loss of substance

If partial deduplication is enabled, then storage efficiency is improved for similar blocks, but metadata structure complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestorage efficiencyVSAvoidmetadata structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the metadata structure into multiple components: sub-block digests, SSM mappings, and deduplication indicators. This segmentation allows the system to efficiently represent partial deduplication relationships without creating overly complex monolithic metadata structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses copying by storing references and mappings (SSM) rather than duplicating entire block data. The SSM structure contains pointers and mapping information that references original sub-blocks, reducing metadata overhead while enabling partial deduplication.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS10990310B2Sub-block data deduplication
Publication Date: 2021.04.27 EMC IP HLDG CO LLC
  • US10990310B2 patent drawing
  • US10990310B2 patent drawing
  • US10990310B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques for data processing may include: determining one or more sub-blocks of a target block that match one or more sub-blocks of a candidate block; creating a shared sub-block mapping (SSM) structure having a plurality of entries, wherein each of the plurality of entries corresponds to a different one of the sub-blocks in the candidate block and wherein a value stored in said each entry, corresponding to one of the sub-blocks of the candidate block, identifies a sub-block of the target block matching said one sub-block of the candidate block; and storing the candidate block as a deduplicated block sharing at least one sub-block with the target block. The SSM structure may be stored as a metadata structure of the candidate block to identify deduplicated sub-blocks of the candidate block and to identify sub-blocks of the target block providing content for the deduplicated sub-blocks of the candidate block.