Dynamic Sub-Computation Unit Activation for Power Efficiency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Computation processing apparatuses with SIMD instructions face inefficiencies in processing performance when the number of parallel data pieces is small, leading to unnecessary power consumption due to operational units being active regardless of data load.

Innovation Solution

A computation processing apparatus that includes a processor capable of decoding instructions and operating as multiple sub-computation units based on data bit width, with an observation unit to identify inactive units, allowing for parallelization and efficient instruction execution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If SIMD computation units operate in parallel regardless of data load, then computation performance is improved, but power consumption increases due to useless operation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputation performanceVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The computation processing apparatus dynamically adjusts the number of active sub-computation units based on the actual computation workload. The control unit determines how many SIMD computation units should be active according to the number of parallel data pieces requiring computation, thereby optimizing the balance between computation performance and power consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the operational parameter of the computation units by adjusting the number of active SIMD lanes based on the data bit width and computation requirements. When fewer parallel data pieces are processed, fewer computation units are activated, changing the system's operational state to match the workload.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If the number of SIMD computation units is increased, then processing capacity is improved, but power consumption increases when data load is small

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing capacityVSAvoiduseless power consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs partial action by activating only the necessary number of SIMD computation units required for the current computation task. Instead of always running all computation units, the control unit enables only the subset needed for the current data load, avoiding excessive power consumption while maintaining sufficient processing capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The apparatus transitions from a static configuration where all computation units are always active to a dynamic configuration where the number of active units varies with the computation workload. This dynamic adjustment eliminates useless power consumption while preserving the ability to scale up processing capacity when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If all computation units are activated, then instruction processing throughput is improved, but energy efficiency deteriorates when not all units are needed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstruction processing throughputVSAvoidenergy efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the operational parameter from a fixed state where all computation units are always active to a variable state where the number of active units is adjusted according to the data bit width and computation requirements. This parameter change optimizes the ratio of instruction processing throughput to energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The control unit implements dynamic control over the activation state of computation units, adjusting the system's operational characteristics in real-time based on the actual computation needs. This dynamic approach maintains high instruction processing throughput when necessary while improving energy efficiency when full capacity is not required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20240143331A1Computation processing apparatus and method of processing computation
Publication Date: 2024.05.02 FUJITSU LTD
  • US20240143331A1 patent drawing
  • US20240143331A1 patent drawing
  • US20240143331A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computation processing apparatus includes: a memory; and a processor coupled to the memory and configured to: decode instructions; execute the instructions which is decoded and operate as a plurality of sub-computation processing apparatuses in accordance with a bit width of data to be computed; and observe an operation state of the computation processing apparatus, wherein, when observing that a subset of the plurality of sub-computation processing apparatuses does not execute an instruction or instructions, the processor parallelizes the instructions and outputs the parallelized instructions.