Subcranial–Subcutaneous Electrode Loop for Precise Brain Stimulation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing brain stimulation methods, such as rTMS, tDCS, vagus nerve stimulation, DBS, and DCS, are either non-invasive but lack precision, invasive but cumbersome, or cause discomfort due to high current settings, and none effectively target specific brain regions without significant surgical intervention.

Innovation Solution

A method and device using a subcranial and subcutaneous electrode pair with a separate conductive path through the skull to create a current loop, allowing precise electrical stimulation by adjusting pulse frequency, shape, amplitude, and duty cycle to influence neuronal firing frequencies.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If rTMS is used to deliver high energy magnetic pulses to the brain, then treatment effectiveness for major depression is improved, but device complexity and cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment effectivenessVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the complex mechanical rTMS system with a simplified electrical stimulation system using electrodes. Instead of using high energy magnetic pulses generated by complex coils, the invention uses direct electrical current delivery through electrodes placed on the scalp, significantly reducing device complexity while maintaining treatment effectiveness for major depression

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the stimulation parameter from high energy magnetic pulses to controlled electrical current. By adjusting current parameters (amplitude, duration, frequency) rather than relying on high energy magnetic fields, the system achieves effective treatment with simpler equipment and reduced complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Device complexity

If tDCS uses electrodes on the outside of the head to deliver current to the brain, then device simplicity is improved, but stimulation precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice simplicityVSAvoidstimulation precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by placing electrodes at specific locations on the scalp corresponding to target brain regions. The electrode placement and current delivery parameters are optimized for specific areas (e.g., left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex for depression), enabling precise stimulation while maintaining device simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dynamic control of current parameters (amplitude, duration, frequency) that can be adjusted based on treatment needs and patient response. This dynamic adjustment capability enables precise targeting of specific brain regions while keeping the device itself simple

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If tDCS current strength is increased to improve treatment effect, then treatment effectiveness is improved, but subject comfort deteriorates due to nerve excitability in the scalp

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment effectivenessVSAvoidsubject comfort
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses periodic pulsed current delivery instead of continuous current. By delivering current in controlled pulses with specific durations and intervals, the system achieves effective treatment while allowing nerve recovery between pulses, significantly improving subject comfort and reducing scalp nerve excitability issues

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent optimizes current parameters (amplitude, pulse duration, frequency) to achieve the minimum effective dose. By carefully controlling these parameters and using pulsed delivery, the system maintains treatment effectiveness while keeping current strength below the threshold that causes discomfort from scalp nerve excitability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Measurement precision

If DBS uses electrodes implanted into deep brain regions, then stimulation precision is improved, but surgical complexity and invasiveness increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestimulation precisionVSAvoidsurgical complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses the scalp and skull as intermediaries to deliver stimulation to deep brain regions. Instead of directly implanting electrodes into the brain (as in DBS), the invention places electrodes on the scalp and uses the skull as a conduit for current to reach target deep brain structures, eliminating the need for complex invasive surgery while maintaining precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from three-dimensional intracranial electrode placement (DBS) to two-dimensional scalp electrode placement. By using the skull as a conductive pathway, the system achieves deep brain stimulation precision through external surface electrodes, fundamentally changing the spatial dimension of electrode placement and eliminating surgical invasiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables precise and comfortable brain stimulation by tuning neuronal firing frequencies to a preselected Q-factor, overcoming the limitations of existing methods by providing targeted and adjustable electrical treatment.

Implementation Method 1

generating electric current pulses with the subcranial electrode and the subcutaneous electrode, the electric current pulses having a pulse frequency, a pulse shape, a pulse amplitude, a pulse width, and a duty cycle, wherein the electric current pulses flow from the subcranial electrode, through a target region of a brain of the subject

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical conduction: Conduction (electrical)

Implementation Method 2

creating a separate conductive path at a separate location through the skull

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical conduction through resistive material: Conduction (electrical)

Data Source

PatentUS20250276181A1Brain stimulation using subcranial electrode and subcutaneous electrode
Publication Date: 2025.09.04 EPIC NEURO INC
  • US20250276181A1 patent drawing
  • US20250276181A1 patent drawing
  • US20250276181A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method is described, which provides electrical stimulation to a person, where the current flows from a subcranial electrode, through a target brain region, through a separate conductive path, and back to a subcutaneous electrode, and where the parameters of the electric current pulses are set to influence the resonant properties of the brain.