Subgridding ADI-FDTD Simulation for Electromagnetic Fields

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) algorithms require dense grids for simulating models with tiny complex structures or high dielectric constants, leading to high computing resource consumption and long simulation times due to the Courant-Friedrich-Levy (CFL) stability condition, which limits the time step and efficiency.

Innovation Solution

The combination of subgridding technique and one-step alternating-direction-implicit-finite-difference time-domain (ADI-FDTD) algorithm, which allows for efficient electromagnetic field simulation by using coarse grids in non-complex areas and dense grids in complex areas, alleviating the CFL stability condition limitations and expanding the time step, thereby reducing computing resources and simulation time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If dense grid division is used for models with tiny complex structures or high dielectric constant, then simulation precision is improved, but computing resources consumption increases hugely

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimulation precisionVSAvoidcomputing resources
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The simulation domain is divided into two distinct regions: a fine grid region for complex structures requiring high precision, and a coarse grid region for simple areas. This segmentation allows each region to use appropriate grid density, reducing overall computing resources while maintaining simulation precision in critical areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different grid densities are applied to different spatial locations based on local requirements. The fine grid region uses dense division where precision is needed, while the coarse grid region uses sparse division where precision requirements are lower, optimizing the balance between simulation precision and computing resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Measurement precision

If dense grid division is used for models with tiny complex structures or high dielectric constant, then simulation precision is improved, but simulation time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimulation precisionVSAvoidsimulation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The simulation domain is divided into two distinct regions: a fine grid region for complex structures requiring high precision, and a coarse grid region for simple areas. This segmentation allows each region to use appropriate grid density, reducing overall computing resources while maintaining simulation precision in critical areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different grid densities are applied to different spatial locations based on local requirements. The fine grid region uses dense division where precision is needed, while the coarse grid region uses sparse division where precision requirements are lower, optimizing the balance between simulation precision and computing resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Ease of operation

If traditional FDTD algorithm is used with CFL stability condition, then algorithm simplicity is maintained, but time step becomes very small leading to long simulation time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealgorithm simplicityVSAvoidsimulation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The algorithm transitions from the traditional explicit FDTD method to the implicit ADI-FDTD method, fundamentally changing the computational approach. This parameter change allows the time step to be determined by accuracy requirements rather than stability constraints, dramatically reducing simulation time while maintaining algorithmic tractability through iterative solving.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20230185995A1Electromagnetic field simulation method based on subgridding technique and one-step alternating-direction-implicit-finite-difference time-domain (ADI-FDTD) algorithm
Publication Date: 2023.06.15 ANHUI UNIV
  • US20230185995A1 patent drawing
  • US20230185995A1 patent drawing
  • US20230185995A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An electromagnetic field simulation method based on subgridding technique and one-step alternating-direction-implicit-finite-difference time-domain (ADI-FDTD) algorithm is provided herein. The method includes establishing an electromagnetic field simulation model by setting an absorption boundary condition, a periodic boundary condition, a total field boundary condition and a scattering field boundary condition based on the one-step ADI-FDTD algorithm, subgridding technique and FDTD algorithm. The electromagnetic field simulation model is configured to select a detection point and a detection surface, obtain a time-domain waveform diagram of a reflection field of a simulation area, a time-domain waveform diagram of a transmission field of the simulation area and frequency-domain information of the simulation area, and simulate an electromagnetic field, by the electromagnetic field simulation model.