Subject Resource Matching via Segmented Classification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing resource allocation methods struggle to optimize resource utilization and workflow for non-average subjects, as they are often based on average or typical subject profiles, leading to suboptimal resource allocation and inefficient workflow in medical and clinical settings.

Innovation Solution

A method that involves obtaining data for a subject, generating data groups for specific subsets of parameters, and applying classification processes to match the subject to resources or workflow steps, using rule-based or machine learning algorithms depending on data sparsity, to ensure tailored resource allocation and efficient workflow.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If data is split into multiple groups for classification, then classification reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification reliabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the classification process into multiple independent data groups, each processed by separate classification algorithms. This segmentation allows each classifier to focus on specific parameter subsets, improving overall classification reliability while maintaining manageable complexity through modular architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the classification problem from a single high-dimensional space into multiple lower-dimensional subspaces by grouping parameters. This dimensional transformation improves classification reliability by reducing the complexity of each individual classification task while collectively covering the full parameter space

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If conventional clustering is applied to all parameters, then comprehensive analysis is achieved, but data sparsity reduces classification reliability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification reliabilityVSAvoiddata population
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the parameter space into multiple groups, the patent ensures that each group contains sufficient data samples for reliable classification. This prevents data sparsity issues that would occur if all parameters were analyzed together in a single high-dimensional space

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies classification to subsets of parameters rather than attempting to classify all parameters simultaneously. This partial action approach ensures adequate data population in each subset, improving classification reliability even though not all parameters are processed with the same depth

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11694790B2Matching a subject to resources
Publication Date: 2023.07.04 KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS NV
  • US11694790B2 patent drawing
  • US11694790B2 patent drawing
  • US11694790B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Presented are concepts for matching a subject to one or more resources or workflow steps. Once such concept comprises obtaining data associated with a subject, the data comprising, for each of a plurality of parameters, a parameter value relating to the subject. A plurality of data groups for characterising the subject is then generated and a classification process is applied to each data group so as to generate a classification result for each data group. The subject is then matched to one or more resources or workflow steps based on the classification results.