Subject-Specific Hemodynamic Response Function fMRI Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current clinical techniques for functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) assume a constant hemodynamic response function, which is not accurate for individual subjects, leading to potential inaccuracies in fMRI studies and lacking diagnostic value.

Innovation Solution

A medical system and method that calculates a subject-specific hemodynamic response function by processing a time series of R2-star maps and stimulus signals, using computational systems integrated into various configurations, including cloud-based systems, workstations, and MRI control systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a constant hemodynamic response function is assumed for all subjects, then the complexity of fMRI analysis is reduced, but the accuracy and diagnostic value of the results deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanalysis complexityVSAvoidaccuracy of fMRI studies
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by transitioning from a fixed, constant hemodynamic response function to a variable, subject-specific hemodynamic response function. The system determines individual HRF parameters (such as peak time, width, and amplitude) for each subject based on their physiological characteristics, thereby improving measurement precision while managing complexity through automated parameter estimation methods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention implements self-service by enabling the system to automatically determine subject-specific hemodynamic response functions without requiring manual intervention or complex user configuration. The computational system autonomously processes fMRI data, estimates HRF parameters, and generates subject-specific models, reducing the burden on operators while maintaining high accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Measurement precision

If subject-specific hemodynamic response functions are determined, then the accuracy and diagnostic value improve, but the computational complexity and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of fMRI studiesVSAvoidcomputational system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-processing fMRI data to extract relevant physiological signals before determining the hemodynamic response function. The system performs initial data cleaning, normalization, and feature extraction to prepare the data for HRF parameter estimation, thereby simplifying the subsequent computational steps and reducing overall processing complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The invention replaces complex mechanical or manual analysis methods with computational algorithms and automated processing systems. Instead of manual HRF parameter determination, the system uses computational models and automated fitting procedures to estimate subject-specific parameters, reducing computational complexity through algorithmic efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Measurement precision

If subject-specific hemodynamic response functions are determined, then diagnostic capability is enhanced, but the time required for processing increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic valueVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by focusing the hemodynamic response function determination on key physiological parameters and critical brain regions rather than analyzing all possible parameters throughout the entire brain. This selective approach maintains diagnostic value while reducing processing time by concentrating computational resources on the most relevant features

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12282079B2Determination of a subject specific hemodynamic response function
Publication Date: 2025.04.22 KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS NV
  • US12282079B2 patent drawing
  • US12282079B2 patent drawing
  • US12282079B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed herein is a medical system (100, 300) where execution of machine executable instructions (120) causes a computational system (104) to: receive (200) a time series of a R2-star map (122) for a brain volume (500); receive (202) a stimulus signal (124) descriptive of an occurrence of a sensory stimulus; receive (204) a selection of one or more seed voxels (126) identified in the time series of the R2-star map; calculate (206) a denoised time series of the R2-star map (128); calculate (208) a correlation map (130) between the seed voxels and the denoised time series of the R2-star map; determine (210) an activated region (132) of the brain volume using voxels identified in the correlation map; provide (212) a hemodynamic response (134) function for each voxel and each occurrence of the sensory stimulus; and provide (214) a subject specific hemodynamic response function (136) by averaging the hemodynamic response functions.