Subject Support Acceleration Measurement Using IMUs

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In medical imaging procedures, the precise positioning and movement of subject supports, such as in CT or MR scanners, are compromised by wear in points of friction and deflection issues, affecting acceleration and velocity accuracy, which can lead to suboptimal imaging and maintenance challenges.

Innovation Solution

Direct acceleration measurement using inertial measurement units (IMUs) affixed to or embedded in the subject support to measure acceleration along one or more axes, allowing for real-time evaluation of wear in points of friction and adjustment for deflection, thereby improving positioning and maintenance scheduling.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If position markers and clock time are used to compute velocity and acceleration, then the measurement system is simple, but the measurement precision deteriorates due to wear in points of friction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveacceleration measurement precisionVSAvoidmeasurement system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical computation method (using position markers and clock time to calculate velocity and acceleration as derivatives) with direct acceleration measurement using inertial measurement units (IMUs). This substitution eliminates the need to compute derivatives from position data and directly provides acceleration measurements, resolving the issue of measurement precision degradation due to friction wear while maintaining system simplicity through the use of self-contained inertial sensors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If points of friction are allowed to wear naturally, then the device complexity is low, but the reliability deteriorates due to changes in acceleration and velocity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepositioning reliabilityVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where inertial measurement units continuously monitor the actual acceleration and velocity of the subject support, and this information is fed back to the control system. The control system compares the measured values with expected values and adjusts the motor control accordingly to compensate for wear in points of friction. This feedback loop maintains positioning reliability without requiring complex mechanical modifications to the friction points themselves.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Stability of the object's composition

If the subject support is supported at one end only, then the device complexity is low, but the stability deteriorates due to deflection of the unsupported end

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesubject support stabilityVSAvoidsupport structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary support mechanism in the form of a roller positioned inside the imaging region bore that provides additional support to the subject support table. This roller acts as a mediator between the subject support and the imaging region, minimizing deflection of the unsupported end during movement. The roller support structure is designed to be minimally intrusive to the imaging process while effectively stabilizing the subject support, balancing stability improvement with acceptable device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution ensures precise and consistent movement of the subject support during imaging, reducing wear-related issues and deflection, leading to improved image quality and scheduled maintenance, thus enhancing the reliability of imaging procedures.

Implementation Method 1

one or more inertial measurement units (IMUs) affixed to or embedded in the subject support measures acceleration along two axes of movement

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInertial measurement: Inertia

Data Source

PatentUS11096650B2Direct acceleration measurement of a subject support
Publication Date: 2021.08.24 KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS NV
  • US11096650B2 patent drawing
  • US11096650B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A subject support includes a fixed portion and a moveable portion coupled to the fixed portion and configured to move along at least one axis relative to the fixed portion, and the coupling includes one or more points of friction that move during movement of the moveable portion and which wear due to at least movement by the moveable portion. The moveable portion receives and supports at least one of an object or a subject during an imaging procedure with an imaging device. One or more inertial measurement units (IMUs) are affixed to or embedded in the moveable portion that directly measure acceleration of translation of the moveable portion along one or more axes.