Submersible Actuator Mixing for Low-Pressure Polymer Activation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing mechanical and non-mechanical polymer blending systems fail to maintain a consistent blend at low water inlet pressures, leading to increased consumption costs and decreased production stability.

Innovation Solution

A mechanical blending system with a submersible motor inside a reaction chamber, featuring multiple blending zones and a high shear mixer, which includes a submersible actuator to maintain a constant blend even at low inlet pressures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If standard mechanical blending systems use external motors and rely on high inlet water pressure (30-50 PSI), then the system structure is simpler, but the blend consistency deteriorates at low inlet pressures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblend consistencyVSAvoidsystem structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the motor and mixing mechanism into a single integrated submersible blending unit that is placed directly inside the reaction chamber. This merging eliminates the need for separate external motor mounting structures and complex water pressure transmission systems, while ensuring consistent blending performance even at low inlet pressures (as low as 5 PSI) because the blending action is driven by the submersible motor rather than by inlet water pressure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Reliability

If non-mechanical blending systems are used with static mixing devices, then the device complexity is reduced, but the blend quality worsens at low inlet pressures (minimum 60 PSI required)

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblend qualityVSAvoidinlet pressure requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces static mixing devices that rely on high water pressure to create turbulence and mixing with an active mechanical submersible blending unit. This unit uses a motor-driven impeller or mixing mechanism that actively stirs and blends the polymer solution, thereby achieving high-quality mixing at very low inlet pressures (5-10 PSI) where static mixers would fail to generate sufficient flow and mixing action.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If high inlet water pressure (30-50 PSI or 60 PSI) is used to maintain constant blend, then the blend consistency is maintained, but the operational cost increases due to higher energy consumption and potential equipment wear

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess stabilityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The submersible blending unit is designed to operate autonomously at low inlet pressures by using its own motor power to drive the mixing action. The system does not require high inlet water pressure to force mixing, as the blending is self-driven by the submersible motor. This self-service capability allows operation at inlet pressures as low as 5-10 PSI, significantly reducing energy consumption and equipment wear compared to systems requiring 30-60 PSI inlet pressure to achieve the same blending quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Reliability

If polymer dosing pump capacity is increased to compensate for poor blend at low pressure, then the blend quality improves, but the consumption cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblend qualityVSAvoidpolymer consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces pressure-dependent passive mixing with an active submersible blending unit that provides consistent mixing performance independent of inlet water pressure. This ensures that polymer is always properly blended and activated regardless of water pressure fluctuations, eliminating the need to increase polymer dosing pump capacity to compensate for poor mixing. As a result, polymer consumption is optimized and waste is reduced, directly addressing the issue of increased consumption costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Ensures a consistent and efficient polymer dilution and activation process at water inlet pressures as low as 35 PSI for mechanical systems and 60 PSI for non-mechanical systems, reducing operational costs and maintaining process stability.

Implementation Method 1

at least one high shear mixer for mixing the one or more substances

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShear mixing: Shear Stress

Implementation Method 2

at least one submersible actuator for actuating the high shear mixer; wherein the high shear mixer is attached to a shaft extension which, in turn, is coupled to the submersible actuator via a shaft coupling unit

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical rotation:

Data Source

PatentEP4168169B1Liquid polymer or chemical activation system using a submersible actuator
Publication Date: 2025.11.05 MERCADO ALVARADO ADALBERTO
  • EP4168169B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4168169B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4168169B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A liquid polymer or chemical activation system, having a chamber; a top cover plate, a middle cover plate and a bottom cover plate; wherein such configuration creates a hollow space inside the chamber that is flanked by the top cover plate and the bottom cover plate; a blending reactor with one or more inlets for receiving one or more substances; an upper multistage mixing cup configured to receive the one or more substances from the one or more inlets; at least one high shear mixer for mixing the one or more substances; at least one submersible actuator for actuating the high shear mixer; an intermediate blending section for receiving the one or more substances from the upper multistage mixing cup; a lower multistage aging cup for further mixing of the one or more substances; and at least one outlet on the bottom cover plate for releasing the one or more substances.