Subnetwork Resource Selection for Mobility and Interference Variation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing technologies face challenges in meeting the extreme performance requirements of latency, reliability, and throughput in in-X subnetworks such as in-robot, in-production module, and in-vehicle subnetworks, particularly in 6G systems, due to varying mobility and interference levels.

Innovation Solution

A mechanism for resource selection in subnetworks that adapts to temporal and spatial interference variations by employing centralized and distributed resource selection modes, determined based on status information such as mobility and communication quality, allowing harmonious coexistence and efficient resource allocation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a single resource selection mode is used for all subnetworks, then the system is simple to manage, but it cannot meet the extreme performance requirements of different subnetwork scenarios

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication reliabilityVSAvoidadaptability to different subnetwork scenarios
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic resource selection mode determination, where the network device selects between centralized and distributed modes based on real-time status information including mobility levels and interference conditions. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to optimize for reliability in high-mobility scenarios while maintaining efficiency in stable environments, directly resolving the contradiction between reliability and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the operational parameter (resource selection mode) based on measured status information such as mobility indicators and interference levels. By monitoring these parameters and switching between centralized and distributed modes accordingly, the system achieves both high reliability when needed and adaptability to varying subnetwork conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If centralized resource selection mode is used, then resource allocation efficiency is improved, but system complexity and signaling overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource allocation efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically switches between centralized and distributed resource selection modes based on subnetwork status. In scenarios requiring high resource allocation efficiency, the centralized mode is activated with full signaling support. In other scenarios, the distributed mode is used to reduce system complexity and signaling overhead, thus resolving the contradiction between productivity and device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Device complexity

If distributed resource selection mode is used, then system complexity is reduced, but ability to meet extreme performance requirements deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidcommunication reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements conditional mode selection where distributed mode is used only when status information indicates favorable conditions (low mobility, low interference). When extreme performance requirements are detected through status monitoring, the system dynamically switches to centralized mode, ensuring reliability is maintained while reducing complexity only when safe to do so.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Reliability

If resource selection adapts to temporal and spatial interference variations, then communication quality is improved, but signaling overhead and processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication qualityVSAvoidsignaling overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent monitors status information parameters including interference levels and mobility indicators to determine resource selection mode. By changing the operational mode based on these parameter thresholds, the system improves communication quality when interference is high while minimizing signaling overhead by using distributed mode during low-interference periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20260075632A1Resource selection for subnetworks
Publication Date: 2026.03.12 NOKIA TECHNOLOGIES OY
  • US20260075632A1 patent drawing
  • US20260075632A1 patent drawing
  • US20260075632A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Example embodiments of the present disclosure relate to resource selection for subnetworks. A first device obtains status information associated with a first subnetwork of the radio access network. The first device determines, based at least on the status information from at least a first mode and a second mode, a resource selection mode for selecting a resource for communication within the first subnetwork. The first device transmits, to a second device in the first subnetwork, configuration information at least associated with the determined resource selection mode.