Sub-network Risk Scoring for Financial Fraud Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for detecting and investigating complex fraud schemes in financial networks are inefficient, particularly in large networks, as existing predictive algorithms struggle to effectively identify high-risk entities and sub-networks for suspicious financial activity.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that involve receiving network data, identifying seed entities based on predefined rules, generating sub-networks, updating risk scores, and calculating risk scores for these sub-networks, allowing for iterative processing and application of predictive algorithms to efficiently detect suspicious financial activity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If existing predictive algorithms are applied to large financial networks, then risk scoring capability is provided, but the algorithms become difficult to apply and efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverisk scoring capabilityVSAvoidapplication efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the large financial network into multiple sub-networks based on entity relationships and risk characteristics. This segmentation allows predictive algorithms to be applied to smaller, more manageable sub-networks rather than the entire large network, improving computational efficiency while maintaining risk scoring capability through iterative processing of segments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a hierarchical dimension by creating multiple levels of sub-networks (first-level, second-level, etc.) based on risk scores and relationship depths. This dimensional transformation allows the system to process network data at different granularities, making large-scale network analysis tractable while preserving comprehensive risk assessment capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If the entire network is examined for suspicious activity, then complete coverage is achieved, but computational efficiency deteriorates in large networks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection coverageVSAvoidcomputational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The network is segmented into sub-networks based on entity relationships and risk characteristics, allowing focused analysis of relevant portions rather than exhaustive examination of the entire network. This maintains detection coverage for high-risk areas while improving efficiency by excluding low-risk segments from intensive analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary risk scoring and identifies high-risk entities before conducting detailed suspicious activity analysis. This preliminary action filters the network data to focus computational resources on entities and sub-networks most likely to contain suspicious activity, achieving efficient targeted detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If deeper understanding of relationships between entities is obtained, then fraud detection accuracy is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud detection accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent analyzes relationships at multiple hierarchical levels by creating sub-networks at different depths (first-level sub-networks, second-level sub-networks, etc.). This dimensional approach enables deeper understanding of entity relationships through iterative expansion while managing complexity through structured, level-by-level processing rather than attempting to analyze all relationships simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the depth and scope of relationship analysis based on risk scores and detected patterns. High-risk entities trigger deeper multi-level sub-network analysis, while low-risk entities receive simpler analysis, making the system adaptively complex rather than uniformly complex throughout.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS9294497B1Method and system for behavioral and risk prediction in networks using automatic feature generation and selection using network topolgies
Publication Date: 2016.03.22 NICE LTD
  • US9294497B1 patent drawing
  • US9294497B1 patent drawing
  • US9294497B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system or method may include receiving, by a processor, data describing a network, wherein the network includes a plurality of entities and links describing relationships between the plurality of entities. The method may further include identifying a set of seed entities from the plurality of entities based on predefined rules. The method may further include generating a set of sub-networks based on the set of identified seed entities, wherein each of the sub-networks may include one or more other entities of the plurality of entities having at least one link to the at least one seed entity. The method may further include calculating a risk score for each of the generated sub-networks.