Sub-perception Neural Modulation with Patient Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional neural modulation systems for conditions like chronic pain often cause uncomfortable paresthesia due to the activation of large sensory dorsal column nerve fibers, which can be an adverse side-effect, and there is a need for a system that can deliver sub-perception therapy without the patient sensing the modulation field.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising electrodes and an implantable device configured to generate a sub-perception modulation field with intensities below the patient-perception threshold, controlled by a controller that adjusts the modulation field in response to patient input, and includes an external device for communication and feedback to assess therapeutic effectiveness and calibrate the modulation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional neural modulation is used to treat chronic pain, then pain relief is achieved, but uncomfortable paresthesia is caused

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepain relief effectivenessVSAvoidparesthesia discomfort
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the intensity parameter of neural modulation to sub-perception levels, below the threshold at which patients perceive paresthesia. This allows pain relief to be achieved while avoiding the uncomfortable sensation associated with conventional stimulation intensities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where patients can report pain levels and modulation effectiveness, allowing the controller to automatically adjust stimulation parameters. This ensures optimal pain relief while maintaining sub-perception intensity to avoid paresthesia.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Object-affected harmful factors

If sub-perception modulation is delivered, then paresthesia is avoided, but therapeutic effectiveness must be carefully calibrated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparesthesia avoidanceVSAvoidtherapeutic effectiveness calibration
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses patient feedback reports and automated sensors to monitor therapeutic effectiveness at sub-perception levels. This feedback loop enables precise calibration of modulation intensity to ensure pain relief is achieved without causing paresthesia.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-calibration using automated algorithms that analyze patient responses and adjust parameters accordingly. This reduces the need for manual programming while ensuring optimal therapeutic effectiveness at sub-perception intensities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of operation

If automated adjustment is implemented, then patient comfort is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepatient comfort controlVSAvoidcontroller automation system
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The controller automatically adjusts modulation parameters based on pre-programmed algorithms and patient feedback without requiring manual intervention. This self-service capability simplifies patient interaction while managing the complexity through automated decision-making processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system includes pre-programmed adjustment algorithms and safety parameters that are prepared in advance. This preliminary configuration allows the automated system to operate within safe boundaries, reducing the perceived complexity while maintaining ease of use.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively delivers pain relief without causing paresthesia, allowing for patient-controlled adjustments and self-calibration, thereby improving the therapeutic efficacy and comfort of neural modulation therapy.

Implementation Method 1

The neural modulation device is configured to use at least some of the electrodes to generate a modulation field to deliver sub-perception modulation to the neural tissue

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectNeural modulation:

Data Source

PatentEP3197541B1Sub-perception modulation responsive to patient input
Publication Date: 2020.11.04 BOSTON SCI NEUROMODULATION CORP
  • EP3197541B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3197541B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP3197541B1 patent drawingFigure 5

AI summary

An example of a system may include electrodes on at least one lead configured to be operationally positioned for use in modulating neural tissue. The neural tissue may include at least one of dorsal horn tissue, dorsal root tissue or dorsal column tissue. The system may include an implantable device including a neural modulation device and a controller. The neural modulation device may be configured to use at least some of the electrodes to generate a modulation field to deliver sub-perception modulation to the neural tissue. The sub-perception modulation may have an intensity below a patient-perception threshold. The patient-perception threshold may be a boundary below which a patient does not sense generation of the modulation field. The controller may be configured to control the neural modulation device to generate the modulation field, and automatically adjust the modulation field in response to a patient input.