Subscriber-Specific ML Ensemble for Digital Threat Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current technologies fail to accurately detect digital fraud and abuse in real-time and lack the ability to evolve and adapt to new threats, leading to insufficient protection for service providers and users.

Innovation Solution

A machine learning-based system that constructs a subscriber-specific ensemble of distinct models to identify digital threats, trained with subscriber-specific data, and calibrated to generate precise threat scores, replacing global models for enhanced detection and mitigation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single global machine learning model is used for all subscribers, then device complexity is reduced, but measurement precision and detection accuracy deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel complexityVSAvoidthreat detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the single global machine learning model into multiple subscriber-specific models, where each model is trained on data from a specific subscriber. This segmentation allows each model to specialize in detecting threats relevant to its subscriber, improving detection accuracy without requiring excessive complexity in any single model.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by creating models with specialized characteristics tailored to each subscriber's specific data patterns and threat profiles. Each subscriber-specific model develops local expertise in detecting threats relevant to its subscriber, rather than using a generic global model that must accommodate all subscribers equally.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Ease of operation

If existing technology implementations are used, then ease of operation is maintained, but reliability and real-time detection capability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem operation simplicityVSAvoidfraud detection reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service by automatically training and deploying subscriber-specific models without requiring manual intervention for each subscriber. The automated pipeline handles data collection, model training, validation, and deployment, maintaining ease of operation while significantly improving reliability through specialized models.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-training models on historical subscriber data before deployment. This preliminary training phase allows models to learn from past patterns and prepare for real-time threat detection, improving reliability while the automated process maintains operational simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Device complexity

If existing technology implementations are used, then device complexity is kept low, but adaptability to new and never-before-encountered threats deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetechnology implementation complexityVSAvoidthreat evolution adaptation
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamics by creating a continuously evolving system where models are retrained on new data as it becomes available. This dynamic approach allows the system to adapt to new and emerging threats automatically, with models evolving their detection capabilities based on latest subscriber data patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where detection results and new threat data feed back into the model training process. This feedback loop enables continuous improvement and adaptation to new threats, with models learning from both successful detections and missed threats to enhance future performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10666674B1Systems and methods configuring a subscriber-specific ensemble of machine learning models
Publication Date: 2020.05.26 SIFT SCIENCE INC
  • US10666674B1 patent drawing
  • US10666674B1 patent drawing
  • US10666674B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A machine learning-based system and method for identifying digital threats that includes implementing a machine learning-based digital threat mitigation service over a distributed network of computers; constructing, by the machine learning-based digital threat mitigation service, a subscriber-specific machine learning ensemble that includes a plurality of distinct machine learning models, wherein each of the plurality of distinct machine learning models is configured to perform a distinct machine learning task for identifying a digital threat or digital fraud; constructing a corpus of subscriber-specific digital activity data for training the plurality of distinct machine learning models of the subscriber-specific ensemble; training the subscriber-specific ensemble using at least the corpus of subscriber-specific digital activity data; and deploying the subscriber-specific ensemble.