Central Subscription Platform for Compliance and Activation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Publishers face challenges in maximizing the number of active subscribers while adhering to varying international regulations regarding email subscriptions, as single opt-in processes may not be compliant with all countries' laws and double opt-in processes can lead to lower subscriber activation rates.

Innovation Solution

A central subscription platform classifies subscribers based on location and risk checks to determine whether to apply a single opt-in or double opt-in process, sending confirmation emails only to those in the double opt-in group until they confirm, thereby ensuring compliance and maximizing active subscribers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a single opt-in process is used for email subscriptions, then subscriber activation rates are maximized, but compliance with international regulations is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesubscriber activation rateVSAvoidregulatory compliance
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different opt-in processes (single or double) to different subscribers based on their location and risk profile. Subscribers from regions with strict regulations undergo double opt-in, while others receive single opt-in treatment, thereby maintaining both compliance and activation rates locally optimized for each region

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The subscriber base is segmented into different groups based on geographic location and risk assessment. This segmentation allows the system to apply appropriate opt-in processes to each segment, ensuring regulatory compliance for high-risk regions while maintaining high activation rates for low-risk regions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If a double opt-in process is used for email subscriptions, then regulatory compliance is ensured, but subscriber activation rates decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveregulatory complianceVSAvoidsubscriber activation rate
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different opt-in processes (single or double) to different subscribers based on their location and risk profile. Subscribers from regions with strict regulations undergo double opt-in, while others receive single opt-in treatment, thereby maintaining both compliance and activation rates locally optimized for each region

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of applying double opt-in universally, the system applies it only partially to subscribers who pose higher compliance risk. This partial application of the stricter process maintains necessary compliance safeguards while avoiding the excessive friction that would reduce overall activation rates

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Adaptability or versatility

If different opt-in processes are applied to different subscribers, then both compliance and activation rates are optimized, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesubscription process flexibilityVSAvoidsubscription system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically classifies subscribers into appropriate opt-in groups based on their location and risk profile without requiring manual intervention. This self-service classification mechanism handles the complexity internally while presenting a simple interface to users and administrators

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from subscriber location data and risk assessment results to automatically determine the appropriate opt-in process. This feedback-driven classification automates the decision-making process, reducing manual complexity while maintaining the flexibility to adapt to different regulatory environments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10938931B1Central subscription platform
Publication Date: 2021.03.02 AHMANN CHRISTIAN NICOLAS
  • US10938931B1 patent drawing
  • US10938931B1 patent drawing
  • US10938931B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems for managing subscription processes, and setting subscribers to active and thereby sending subscribers future content, are disclosed. A method includes: receiving a first email address of a first subscriber and a second email address of a second subscriber; classifying the first subscriber into a first group based on a location of the first subscriber and the second subscriber into a second group based on a location of the second subscriber; sending a confirmation email including a confirmation button or link to the first email address of the first subscriber in the first group; and sending a content email to the second email address of the second subscriber in the second group, and avoiding sending the content email to the first email address of the first subscriber in the first group until receiving an indication that the first subscriber has selected the confirmation button or link.